Answer: the answer that was here before me had a bunch of paragraphs
and turns out it was theres more information here lol but the last paragraphs i put in my own words hope this helpes also if theres something that bothers u with this answer plz comment down below so that i can fix it! thanks! and Peace!
so I checked this on a plagiarism site and its 31% plagiarized so i went to a paraphrasing site - https:// quillbot.com - just get rid of the space - so once i paraphrased it here i went back to the plagiarism checker and it said zero percent plagiarized, i recommend doing this before getting a bad grade, also u dont have to change the topic but it would most likely be safer
also is ur looking for a plagiarism checker don't to Grammarly takes to long lol
ok also also - here's for example the same exact paragraph just with a changed topic and phrased differently -
My peers and I debated whether schools should have healthier lunches or not. We had several different viewpoints and views on the subject in our debate. By gathering background research on the subject, I prepared for this discussion. We had debates between my party. Not all of us were in agreement with each other. I listed several factual pieces of evidence that led to my point of view: I agree that on a daily basis, schools should have healthier lunches. - Healthier lunches means healthier kids - according to an online source. Not only would it be necessary to eat healthier but it would also keep children more focused in school.
I shared with my peers this truth. Many did not agree with me, however. We remained on the topic and discussed each other politely. In order to support my opinion, I found that I needed a good understanding of the subject and background study. Overall, with my fellow peers, this was a
very efficient debate. I enjoyed discussing my experience and my opinion and describing it. As we concentrated, I felt that I was profoundly connected to my peers. I talked animatedly as I explained my reasoning. I needed their attention to be drawn. My peers and I had a fruitful debate, as you can see.
Also this paragraph is posted by muah XR - so this is just an example, remember to rephrase it and put it in your own words and to change the topic thanks!
Answer:
Yes, because you are away from your family and some people die in prison prison is a bad place some of the guards are not helpfull there.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
On March 4th, when Charlie took the Rorschach Test, he was supposed to view the images of the inkblots and freely imagine what he saw in them. But Charlie only saw the inkblots for what they were: blobs of ink. Even when Burt tells him to imagine, to pretend, to look for something there in the card, Charlie can't. He struggles to give a true description of the cards, pointing out how one was "a very nice pictur of ink with pritty points all around the eges," but again, this isn't the response that the psychologist is looking for.
Like ambiguously shaped clouds in which people "see" images of people and animals, the inkblots have enough random, busy shapes on them for people to interpret them as many different things--people, animals, scenes, conflicts, and so on. The idea is that the psychologist will pay attention to what a person thinks he or she sees in the inkblots, which is supposed to provide insight on what that person thinks and feels overall.
As a result of Charlie's inability to properly take this test, he worries that he's failed and that he won't be a candidate for the treatment to increase his intelligence. And while he gets frustrated with himself during the test, and while Burt seems to get almost angry--as evinced when his pencil point breaks--I wouldn't say that Charlie is angry in this situation.
But what this scene does reveal about his character is that perhaps he's already smarter than we expect. By insisting on seeing the inkblots for what they really are, and by failing to imagine scenes and images that are false or skewed, Charlie shows that he's not just honest but scrupulous. This early evidence of his good character foreshadows the upcoming conflicts he has with the men at the bakery as well as the researchers themselves, who are less scrupulous.
