Answer:
a. interviews were expensive to conduct
Explanation:
The disadvantage of in depth interview contained in the scenario is that face to face or in-depth interviews are expensive to conduct.
The rationale behind this conclusion is as presented in the scenario that ''In order for executives to agree to the interviews the company provides a large cash incentive.''
The fact that in-depth interview could be paid for, in order to guarantee its occurrence; is a practical display of the fact that in-depth interview or Face-to-Face method, is very expensive.
Answer:
(a) Income Statement
Belyk Paving Co.
Income statement for the year xxxx
Sales $2,384,000
Cost of goods sold $1,441,000
Gross Profit $943,000
Administrative and selling expenses $436,600
Depreciation expense $491,600
Operating Income 14,800
Interest expense $216,600
Income before Tax ($201,8000)
Tax rate 35% <u> $0 </u>
Net Loss <u>($201,800)</u>
(b) operating Cash flow
Net Loss ($201,800)
Add: Non cash Expenses (Depreciation) <u> $491,600</u>
Cash flow from operating activities <u> $289,800 </u>
Answer:
The difference is attributed to sales.
Explanation:
The difference of $10 will be attributed to sales because $20 is charged instead of $30 which means selling price has been changed. However, it cannot be considered as a loss because the cost price is not given. It might be the actual cost price for the item is $15 and the store is selling at $20 instead of $30. So, in this case, the store is making a profit of $5. Thus, the difference is considered as the sale difference.
Answer:
d. cost-less will go out of business, and durable will gain higher power over its customers.
Explanation:
Durable ceramics, inc will only reduce its prices if this is to its advantage. We live in a capitalist world where companies make decisions based on their own benefits. In this case, in order for Durable ceramics, inc to lower its prices and have no losses, it would expand its sales. In this way, Durable ceramics, inc would be able to capture customers from its competitors, and could make them go bankrupt.
Thus, we can conclude that if Durable ceramics, inc reduced its prices, Cost-Less would go out of business and Durable would gain greater power over its customers.
No, Because Harriet had no knowledge of the painting for her house, While there was an added benefit. There is no quasi-contract at all.
