Mostly likely no. He could've done more. If he had done more there probably wouldn't be a need for the civil rights act of 1964.
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Either shoes or skinny jeans, I'd go with shoes. Xavier would grow in both height and weight as he goes through the growth spurt. As his height grows, his foot will grow accordingly as he needs support for his enlarging body. So he would need shoes prior to all others.
The experiment fit into the "big picture" purpose of the scientist's research because C The scientist could repeat the experiment with blocks of limestone of different sizes in each beaker in order to compare the effects of the two different acid concentrations. The scientist could then make a conclusion about which concentration of acid has a stronger effect on the limestone.
<h3>What is
experiment?</h3>
An experiment can be regarded as a procedure that is a been carried out in order to support or refute a hypothesis.
It is been carried out in order to determine the efficacy or likelihood of something that has not been tried.
It should be noted that Experiments provide insight so as to know the outcome using some factors.
Read more about experiment here:
brainly.com/question/17274244
#SPJ1
Hektor’s perspective reveals his regret about previous actions.
Hektor, who was deeply worried, said to his own kind soul, "Ah me! Since he attempted to force me to lead the Trojans inside the city on that dreadful night when brilliant Achilleus sprang up and I refused to comply, Poulydamas will be the first to accuse me if I enter the wall and gateway at this time.
However, that would have been much better. As a result of my own carelessness, I have now destroyed my people.
The first bold indicates that he regrets making particular actions, and the second bold indicates the outcome of that actions.
Learn more about actions here:
brainly.com/question/2180986
#SPJ9
