Answer:
a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. The options are:
a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
b)Solicitation with promise of reward.
c) Appropriate.
d) Generalized
e) Positional authority.
In psychology, coercion is the act of forcing another person to act in a way that the person doesn't want to by using force or threats. This threats can include punishment if the person doesn't act the way the other person is asking to.
In this example Mathew promises to fire her if she doesn't engage in sexual activity with him. T<u>his "promise" is more like a threat and the consequence of not complying with it would be the punishment of getting fired</u>. Therefore, the right answer would be that this type of sexual harassment is a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
He did it to <span>enable the United Sates to pursue a "flexible response" defense policy
</span> "flexible response" defense policy refers to the type of defense strategy that could be easily adjusted depending on the situation so united states could achieve the most benefit while avoiding unnecessary confrontation. This policy was the result of Kennedy's opposition stance toward Eisenhower's defense policy that is overly reliant on nuclear weapons.
Answer:
D. is the probability that the test correctly rejects the null when the alternative is true.
Explanation:
true
as the consumer pays the money to buy whatever service is needed by him
plz mark brainliest
Answer:
Explanation:
For many, water scarcity is a problem in the post. By 2025, one in every two people on the planet will live with water stress. For one in nine, the problem is already here. ... In response, the United Nations made water and sanitation a matter of human rights, declared and defined, in 2010.
Access to water and sanitation are recognized by the United Nations as human rights, reflecting the fundamental nature of these basics in every person’s life. Lack of access to safe, sufficient and affordable water, sanitation and hygiene facilities has a devastating effect on the health, dignity and prosperity of billions of people, and has significant consequences for the realization of other human rights.
People are rights-holders and States are duty-bearers of providing water and sanitation services. Rights-holders can claim their rights and duty-bearers must guarantee the rights to water and sanitation equally and without discrimination.