1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Butoxors [25]
3 years ago
11

Describe the experiences of immigrants to the united states in the late 1800s. Explain how immigrants contributed to the nation'

s growth during this period.
History
2 answers:
wlad13 [49]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation: The experiences of immigrants to the United States were positive, in that they were able to solve their economic situation a little. Most of these immigrants were of European origin, whose countries were at war, a situation not pleasant for them. In the United States they had the opportunity of a new resurgence in the political, economic and social aspects. Immigrants contributed to the growth of the nation with the contribution of the migratory flow, as well as their cultural contribution, also the commercial relations between Europe and America were greatly facilitated.

madam [21]3 years ago
4 0

The United States, the country par excellence of the immigration fact, constitutes the most important area of ​​immigration in the world today. Between 1820 and 1990 the "empty continent" has welcomed more than 55 million people from the most diverse places on the planet. American immigration presents very peculiar features, and offers clear differences with respect to that which takes place in Western Europe. These differences refer both to the volume of flows and their composition and to the social perception of the migratory phenomenon. American society has been born of immigration and has developed with the contribution and effort of immigrants. One of the essential components of North America's image of itself is its history as an immigrant nation. Immigration is a substantial part of its national mythology, unlike in Europe where the essence and origin of different nations has been justified in cultural homogeneity. In societies that were considered perfectly configured, like the French, the contribution of immigrants has never been valued as a contribution to the creation of their people, which since the Revolution of 1789 was already presented as a finished whole. On the contrary, it has been seen as a temporary aid or relief for its development, and as a long-term problem against national and cultural unity. Although almost all Americans are or are descended from immigrants of greater or less seniority, or precisely because of this, American history has lived permanently immersed in an endless debate on immigration: what immigrants to admit, how many, with what characteristics ... and around the balances in the mix of ethnic and cultural origins .

This debate has been revived at times of increased migration and, above all, transformation of its composition, and it shows the collision between the pressures of recently arrived immigrants, the interest of ethnic-cultural groups of origin older - who see their relative weight decrease in society - and the demands of the labor market. The discussion about assimilation, integration or pluriculturalism is particularly intense within the American society. The xenophobic reactions of "nativists" against immigrants have been argued in the impossibility of their Americanization, and in the risk that this would entail for American society. They intensified from the eighties of the nineteenth century, when the change in the origin of the newcomers began and a strong and uninterrupted rise in the number of immigrants, which culminated around 1910. It was then attended a displacement in the traditional wave of European immigration coming from the countries of the North and the West (Great Britain, Ireland and Germany, fundamentally) to those of the East and the South of Europe, at the same time as the influx of Asians intensifies. Especially Chinese who fled the poverty of the Canton region and were recruited in the United States by the demand for labor that produced the "gold rush" in California and for the construction of railroads. The "nativists" expressed a clear hostility toward non-English speaking immigrants. The aversion was particularly directed towards the Asians, until culminating in California with the promulgation of the "Chinese Exclusion Act" in 1882.

You might be interested in
How did Napoleon's invasion of Portugal impact Portuguese colonies in the<br> Americas?
Vilka [71]

Answer:

Napoleonic Wars in Europe had an impact on almost all the colonies in the Americas. These wars were a distraction for all the European powers. The Naval blockade of the Atlantic allowed the colonies to assert their independence and rebel.

Mexico gained independence in 1821. Louisiana's purchase was also resulted due to the Napoleonic wars when the British Navy made it impossible for Napoleon to control the new territories in the Americas, he sold Louisiana to the US.

The wars caused Portuguese leaders to leave Europe and rule the colony of Brazil from the colony itself. Due to Napoleonic wars, the Portuguese court fled from Brazil and it became a kingdom. It allowed them to trade with any country. When Brazil finally became independent of French occupation in 1815 it had become accustomed to the local leadership this was a major issue which leads to the Brazilian War of Independence

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the industrial Revolution affect the northern economy
stellarik [79]

Answer:

the north got a lot more factories and started to produce a lot of goods that were needed all over.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The columbian exchange was based on interactions between the old world and?
igor_vitrenko [27]
<span>The columbian exchange was based on interactions between the old world and the "New World," since it involved the exchange of goods, ideas, etc between places like the Americas and Europe. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
In Rome’s legislative branch, plebeians served in the Assemblies while the Senate’s members were. consuls. tribunes. patricians.
saw5 [17]
In Rome’s legislative branch, plebeians served in the Assemblies while the Senate’s members were "patricians". This word meant "father" and they were given far more responsibility than the plebeians. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which event was the most important in turning the tide of the war in the Pacific against the Japanese? Why?
Scorpion4ik [409]
Battle of Midway, because we destroyed most of the Japanese Navy, sinking four of their aircraft carriers along with lots of other ships. Japan would never recover from this, allowing the US to mostly dominate the Pacific with our Navy.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What year did texans elect the first woman ever to represent the state in the u.s. senate?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did some military officers object to the use of poisonous gas as a weapon?
    7·2 answers
  • Slavery NEVER existed in Northern Colonies. <br><br> True or False
    14·2 answers
  • Which river was the city of Rome built near?​
    13·2 answers
  • State governments have the power to?
    10·2 answers
  • Judicial branch covered by​
    12·2 answers
  • How has urbanization affected the environment in the United States?
    14·1 answer
  • Helpppppp!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Why was football popular during world war II?
    10·2 answers
  • List three major current events happening in the United States now that interest you
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!