The Japanese justified their imperialism in multiple different ways, depending on what territory is in question.
For China, there was a fake attack on Japanese property, performed by the Japanese themselves, so they invaded Manchuria with the justification that their citizens were in danger.
Korea and Taiwan were justified in the sense that some countries had colonies which they used for resources and as market for their products, so the Japanese justified it in the manner that they also deserve to have such territories.
For some territories they conquered there was no real justification though, and the Japanese didn't really bothered with making excuses anymore.
The right answer is C. Alchol consumption decreased but did not entirely stop.
Answer:
Because in the south, there had been small riots for years, whereas in the north, there was a series of very large riots because the north had not previously had riots. The south had continuously been having smaller riots for years before and after (Including lynching, murder of African Americans, and attacks on black businesses, etc.)
Answer:
All men are equal and independent. All people have inalienable rights. The outlining of jobs and limited power of government. Non-government organizations tend to have wider reach in helping minorities compared to government organization. Organization such as NAACP for example, provide services to help eliminate social injustices by giving free Job agencies and law-related help for minorities. Local government in colonial America was the seedbed of American constitutionalism—a simple fact insufficiently appreciated by those writing in American political theory. Evidence for neglect can be found simply by examining any book dealing with American constitutional history and noting the absence of references to colonial documents written by Americans. Rather, at best there will be brief references to Magna Carta, perhaps the English Constitution, and probably the Declaration of Independence. If the authors of these books discuss the source of American constitutional theory beyond these few documents, they will almost inevitably mention European thinkers, John Locke being prominent among them. It is the purpose of this volume to end such neglect and reverse such attitudes.
hope this helps and feel free to put brainiest
