1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zubka84 [21]
4 years ago
11

Once a judge has determined that the plaintiff is to be awarded a certain sum of money, the plaintiff may begin the process to o

btain the money from the defendant by having the sheriff or other court official seize the defendant's property and sell it. This is called:
Law
1 answer:
professor190 [17]4 years ago
3 0

The given is called a writ of attachment or an order of attachment .

<u> Explanation: </u>

In the court of law the defendant is an individual or company accused for committing a crime. If the judge has pronounced a judgement in favour of the plaintiff in the case of any disputes which may be a settlement in the form of money or in the form of assets.

The plaintiff may take the help of the court or court appointed sheriff to settle the dues from defendant. So the court appointed officials will make use of their power and protect the assets being sold. And this court process is known as order of attachment.

You might be interested in
PLS Important, 2 questions
Mama L [17]

Answer:

3 basic rights.

1.Religious freedom

2. Freedom of speach

3. Freedom of the press

Explanation:

All of our rights even inalianable rights come with limits.

The only right that has no limits is the freedom of thought which is the same as religious freedom. You have the right to think and believe anything. But even that has restrictions on how you can act on your beliefs. Your religious beliefs are not a license to do anything related to that belief. You can't engage in human sacrifice as a ritual for the belief. You can't hide behind your religous beliefs as a sheild against prosecution for murder.

"Freedom of religion embraces two concepts, -freedom to believe and freedom to act. The first is absolute, but in the nature of things the second cannot be. ~ <em>Cantwell v Connecticut.</em>

<em />

The freedom of speach also has limits. You can say anything but you can't yell fire in a crowded theater. Doing so could cause a stampede and endanger the lives of others. Likewise, we have an impeachment case before the Senate right now in which the former president incited a riot at the Capital complex that caused the death of 6 people. The question before the Senate is did the former President incite a riot causing death and destruction of public property?  

The freedom of the press is a first amendment right. But that doesn't give a publisher the right to slander or print falsehood about another person. The freedom of assembly is another 1st amendment right, but there is a difference between a lawful and peaceful assembly and a riot that results in the death of 5 people and the destruction of property.  

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Good Morning Everyone!!! I would appreciate if someone answered this for me
stealth61 [152]
The answer is D, brainliest?
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
¿Qué necesitamos para lograr un estilo de vida en materia de Derechos Humanos?​
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

cil transmitir información sobre los derechos humanos que modificar actitudes y conductas. Es afectar los corazones, los estilos de vida, las convicciones. Educar en derechos humanos no puede reducirse al orden intelectual, pertenece al reino de los sentimientos, de las pasiones, porque supone trascender la palabra y pasar a la acción.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What happens to the punishment if it can be proven that the victim was selected specifically based on bias or prejudice?
frez [133]

Answer:increased 1 category

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
In the court of law are what's to the right of the judge?
geniusboy [140]
C. is your answer ...........
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If history is a guage, the U.S. Government cannot be trusted when it comes to sending our children to war. It seems that many ye
    15·1 answer
  • 12. What does this sign mean? A. Slow down, be ready to stop if needed to let cross traffic pass before you proceed. B. Stop and
    8·2 answers
  • People who blame others or events beyond their control when something goes wrong are said to have a(n) A) authoritarian leadersh
    12·1 answer
  • Knock knock?
    7·2 answers
  • Question:<br> What happens after a 60-day suspension of a probationary license?
    6·2 answers
  • People are____ to drink and drive if they believe their chances of getting caught are high.
    12·2 answers
  • Judicial Review, amendments, and the elastic clause are examples o
    6·1 answer
  • The shift in Canada WW1 and after that year, PLEASE HELP VERY EASY WRITE A PARAGRAPH
    7·2 answers
  • Why is the purpose of self respect and neighboring communities
    5·2 answers
  • Which Florida county courts hear misdemeanor criminal cases?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!