1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zubka84 [21]
4 years ago
11

Once a judge has determined that the plaintiff is to be awarded a certain sum of money, the plaintiff may begin the process to o

btain the money from the defendant by having the sheriff or other court official seize the defendant's property and sell it. This is called:
Law
1 answer:
professor190 [17]4 years ago
3 0

The given is called a writ of attachment or an order of attachment .

<u> Explanation: </u>

In the court of law the defendant is an individual or company accused for committing a crime. If the judge has pronounced a judgement in favour of the plaintiff in the case of any disputes which may be a settlement in the form of money or in the form of assets.

The plaintiff may take the help of the court or court appointed sheriff to settle the dues from defendant. So the court appointed officials will make use of their power and protect the assets being sold. And this court process is known as order of attachment.

You might be interested in
What is my life about?
torisob [31]

Answer:

Living life with others?

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who limits the President’s power by finding laws unconstitutional?
Scilla [17]

Answer:

The answer is Congress. I believe!!!

6 0
3 years ago
Which branch has the responsibility is execute the instructions given by congress?
Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

<h3>The legislative branch</h3>

Explanation:

I hope it's helpful for you!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the supreme court's main decision in Palko v. Connecticut?
Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

Search Results

Featured snippet from the web

Supreme Court decision presiding that the Fourth Amendment's defense in contradiction of unreasonable explorations and appropriations must be prolonged to the states in addition to the federal government. This upturned Polka v Connecticut, asserting that defense from double jeopardy does relate in state courts.

Explanation: the court looked at the fourteenth amendment to make their decision and looks like they could`t decide

3 0
3 years ago
Can anyone please help?
olganol [36]
I think that it is not he first option
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 50 POINTS.!!!! REALLY QUICK.!!!! Arrange the steps of the pretrial process in the correct sequence.
    10·2 answers
  • Craig Brown owns a home in San Francisco, California. There is a major earthquake and his house is damaged by the earthquake. Wh
    15·1 answer
  • 2) What is it called to restrain a person with intent to prevent his freedom by
    5·2 answers
  • 15. The description of the lawmaking process in
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following developments during the 1780s produced the STRONGEST calls for a new national constitution and government
    5·1 answer
  • Samathahas a small business selling clothes. Because his shop is too small to store all his goods so he must hire a a warehouse.
    11·1 answer
  • Who's against gun control laws?
    8·1 answer
  • Bailbonds are guaranteed of a appearance
    6·1 answer
  • What are some risks of a case failing in court?
    14·2 answers
  • Enzo has recovered a bullet at a crime scene. He needs help determining what type of gun was used to fire it. What is his BEST r
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!