A debate from the perspective of a Northerner over Missouri Statehood would be one talking about the importance of limiting slavery.
A argument from a Southerner would be one arguing that Northerners should allow slavery in states that want slavery.
<h3>What were the arguments for Missouri Statehood?</h3>
Missouri wanted to gain admission into the Union as a slave state and the North did not want this because they were against slavery spreading to other parts of the Union.
Southerners on the other hand, wanted slavery in Missouri as they believed that it would increase the power of slave states in Congress. They therefore argued that territories such as Missouri that wanted slavery, should be free to have slavery.
Find out more on Missouri Statehood at brainly.com/question/1855671.
its a good idea but when implemented it failed look at their population it's still HUGE and now that they removed it the population is going to rise again.
Answer:
Unlike Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt, the inhabitants of the Indus Valley Civilization did not build large, monumental structures. There is no conclusive evidence of palaces or temples—or even of kings, armies, or priests—and the largest structures may be granaries.
Explanation:
hope it will help you
Answer:
A. To search for business opportunities
Well, your answer is going to be........ <span>In the year of 1763, the British territory had been extended all the way to the Mississippi River. France had only gained New Orleans and the islands of St Pierre and Miquelon east of the Mississippi.
I hope this helped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest</span>
