Answer:
The answer is: All the options are correct (I, II and III)
Explanation:
The larger the number of individuals (e.g. securities analysts, investors) who are informed about the price system of securities, the prices of securities will approach informational efficiency.
When the system approaches informational efficiency, you can determine which securities are riskier than others. Therefore you can price riskier securities so that they offer higher expected returns.
The other positive effect of informational efficacy is that investors can determine which securities are undervalued or overvalued.
Answer:
Please refer to the below for the appropriate journal entry
Explanation:
Accounts receivable Dr $726,700
($676,000 + $50,700)
Sales revenue account Cr $676,000
Sale taxes payable account Cr $50,700
{(6% + 1.5%) × $676,000
Answer:
The percentage change in nominal GDP from 2013 to 2014 was 4.29%
The percentage change in real GDP from 2012 to 2013 was 1.48%
The percentage change in real GDP from 2012 to 2013 was higher than the percentage change in real GDP from 2011 to 2012. FALSE
Explanation:
In order to calculate this we just have to calculate the percentages with a rule of thirds:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2924/e29246050b383c6e073a2398d753e09cf523f62d" alt="\frac{GDP1}{100}= \frac{GDP2}{x}"
To calculate the first one we use the nominal GDP which is the GDP with the current market value:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b320d/b320d160ad146410c139be72f6ebf9e2745069b7" alt="\frac{GDP1}{100}= \frac{GDP2}{x}\\\frac{16,663.2}{100}= \frac{17,348.1 }{x}\\x=\frac{(100)(17,348.1}{16,663.2} \\x=4.29%"
To calculate the change in real GDP we use the values adapted to a pre-agreed monetary value, in this case the dollar at 2009:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52434/524343c31f6cd647ca0047bab785857fd2222b02" alt="\frac{GDP1}{100}= \frac{GDP2}{x}\\\frac{15,354.6}{100}= \frac{15,583.3}{x}\\x=\frac{(100)(15,583.3}{15,354.6} \\x=1.48%"
To calculate the 2011 to 2012 we insert the values:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d940/1d94059ccb75845490a9c85014386685ba2b971c" alt="\frac{GDP1}{100}= \frac{GDP2}{x}\\\frac{ 15,020.6}{100}= \frac{15,354.6}{x}\\x=\frac{(100)(15,354.6}{ 15,020.6} \\x=2.22%"
So with this we know that it is wasn´t higher the percentage change from 2012-2013, than that of 2011-2012
Answer:
A
Explanation:
DOL = Percentage change in EBIT / percentage change in sales
EPS = {(EBIT - Interest) × (1 - T) } / Shares
The firm has no debt, so interest would be zero
EPS = EBIT × (1 - T) / Shares.
Tax rate and number of outstanding shares remain unchanged.
Percentage Change in EPS = EBIT.
Percentage Change in EPS = (6.5 / 4) - 1 = 0.625 = 62.5%
EBIT = 62.5%
Percentage change in sales= 20%
DOL = 62.5% / 20% = 3.13