1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liq [111]
4 years ago
12

Which of the following is an example of an army custom?

Social Studies
2 answers:
icang [17]4 years ago
4 0
Which of the following is an example of an army custom would be: <span>Don't jump the chain of command.
Custom is a set of rules that define proper behavior but does not actually punishable by formal law if its being violated. The punishment for jumping a chain of command usually only informal punishments such as running or cleaning the base</span>
kirza4 [7]4 years ago
4 0

Answer :

Don’t jump the chain of command.

Explanation :

Chain of command refers to the command hierarchy which establishes the relationship between the army personnel by clearly defining their authorities and responsibilities. It is necessary to maintain and ensure the discipline in the army and accomplishing the aimed mission.  

Further Explanation :

The chain of command in military chain is an integral part of the life of a military man who is required to deliver his services by cherishing the values of discipline. The chain of command in the army runs right from the lowest ranking Recruits to the President of United States who is the Commander-in-Chief of army.

The chain of command is military is necessary to ensure the clarity in the communication in army when the orders is issued downwards and every successive subordinate has to fulfill the orders passed down by his senior. In the same manner the issues and complexities of every successive subordinate in the chain has to be resolved by their successive superiors.  

The command of chain is hence further necessary to achieve the complete coordination of operations and accountability of personnel when everyone has their designated roles and responsibilities to fulfill.

Learn More:  

Learn more about the military force as a hard power: brainly.com/question/11537817 ;

(Answered by WeightednereidAmbitious )

Learn more about the Department of Defense : brainly.com/question/2178964 ;

(Answered by Francocanacari )

Keywords :

Chain of command in military, discipline of army, hierarchy in US military, importance of chain of command.

You might be interested in
Which midwestern governor served as a progressive model for other governors by implementing the "wisconsin way"?
Gala2k [10]
I believe the answer is <span>Robert La Follette.
</span><span>Robert La Follette was a republican progressive that served as the governor of Wisconsin between the period of </span><span>January 7, 1901 – January 1, 1906.
The Wisconsin way refers toprogressivessive policies that he created to improve worker's payment and safety on the working sites.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A __________ will masquerade as a seemingly useful program while actually compromising system security and possibly acting as a
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

Trojan

Explanation:

According to my research on different computer viruses, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the type of computer virus being defined is called a Trojan. This is a virus that (like defined in the question) acts as a "back-door" into the victim system. This was named after the Trojan Horse strategy used by the Greeks in order to get into the city of Troy.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

6 0
3 years ago
To learn more about internship opportunities, you should contact companies' _____ departments?
Archy [21]

its B.human resources

4 0
3 years ago
Analyze the ways in which the formation of overseas colonial empires both benefited and harmed the interests of Europeans states
Dahasolnce [82]

Europe is a relatively small continent, especially compared to Asia or Africa, but during the last five hundred years, European countries have controlled a huge part of the world, including almost all of Africa and the Americas.

The nature of this control varied, from the benign to the genocidal, and the reasons also differed, from country to country, from era to era, from simple greed to ideologies of racial and moral superiority such as 'The White Man's Burden.

They are almost gone now, swept away in a political and moral awakening over the last century, but the after-effects spark a different news story almost every week.

A Desire to Find New Trade Routes Inspired Exploration

There are two approaches to the study of the European Empires. The first is straightforward history: what happened, who did it, why they did it, and what effect this had, a narrative and analysis of politics, economics, culture, and society.

The overseas empires began to form in the fifteenth century. Developments in shipbuilding and navigation, which allowed sailors to travel across the open seas with much greater success, coupled with advances in maths, astronomy, cartography, and printing, all of which allowed better knowledge to be more widely spread, gave Europe the potential to extend over the world.

Pressure on land from the encroaching Ottoman Empire and a desire to find new trade routes through to the well-known Asian markets—the old routes being dominated by Ottomans and Venetians—gave Europe the push—that and the human desire to explore.

Some sailors tried going around the bottom of Africa and up past India, others tried going across the Atlantic. Indeed, the vast majority of sailors who made western voyages of discovery were actually after alternative routes to Asia the new American continent in between was something of a surprise

If the first approach is the sort you will encounter mainly in history textbooks, the second is something you'll encounter on the television and in the newspapers: the study of colonialism, imperialism, and the debate over the effects of empire.

As with most 'isms,' there is still an argument over exactly what we mean by the terms. Do we mean them to describe what the European nations did? Do we mean them to describe a political idea, which we will compare to Europe's actions? Are we using them as retroactive terms, or did people at the time recognize them and act accordingly?

This is just scratching the surface of the debate over imperialism, a term thrown around regularly by modern political blogs and commentators. Running alongside this is the judgmental analysis of the European Empires.

The last decade has seen the established view—that the Empires were undemocratic, racist and thus bad—challenged by a new group of analysts who argue that the Empires actually did a lot of good.

The democratic success of America, albeit achieved without much help from England, is frequently mentioned, as are the ethnic conflicts in African 'nations' created by Europeans drawing straight lines on maps.

There are three general phases in the history of Europe's colonial expansion, all including wars of ownership between the Europeans and indigenous people, as well as between the Europeans themselves.

The first age, which began in the fifteenth century and carried on into the nineteenth, is characterized by the conquest, settlement, and loss of America, the south of which was almost entirely divided between Spain and Portugal, and the north of which was dominated by France and England.

However, England won wars against the French and Dutch before losing to their old colonists, who formed the United States; England retained only Canada. In the south, similar conflicts occurred, with the European nations being almost thrown out by the 1820s.

During the same period, European nations also gained influence in Africa, India, Asia, and Australasia (England colonized the whole of Australia), especially the many islands and landmasses along the trading routes. This 'influence' only increased during the nineteenth and early twentieth century, when Britain, in particular, conquered India.

However, this second phase is characterized by the 'New Imperialism,' a renewed interest and desire for overseas land felt by many European nations which prompted 'The Scramble for Africa,' a race by many European countries to carve up the entirety of Africa between themselves. By 1914, only Liberia and Abysinnia remained independent.

In 1914, the First World War began, a conflict partly motivated by imperial ambition. The consequent changes in Europe and the world eroded many beliefs in Imperialism, a trend enhanced by the Second World War. After 1914, the history of the European Empires—a third phase—is one of gradual decolonization and independence, with the vast majority of empires ceasing to exist.

4 0
3 years ago
Broadcast spawning is where fish gather together and release sperm and eggs into the water for fertilization. This type of repro
sleet_krkn [62]
A i’m pretty sure....
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which ethnic group is most numerous in Southwest Asia?
    9·2 answers
  • The North Central Plains is separated from the rest of Texas by the
    6·2 answers
  • 11. How did George Westinghouse contribute to railroad transportation? (1 point)
    11·1 answer
  • Title insurance is :
    9·1 answer
  • When 80-year-old Ida looked at one of her old wedding pictures, she was flooded with vivid memories of her parents, her husband,
    9·1 answer
  • Which city was the home of most movie productions?
    13·2 answers
  • Attributional ambiguity refers to
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following
    6·1 answer
  • Describe how your business provides a good, service or both?
    7·1 answer
  • What action will help make a social media campaign successful?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!