Answer:
B pretty sure
Explanation: B because they became a sharecropper because of debt in the first place and when they were there their owners wouldn't give them much of a salary at all and they legally couldn't sell their own crops.
The larger goal was uniting Americans around the war effort.
Cracking down on dissent would be a negative action in support of the larger, positive goal the government sought. The government wanted a fully united public in support of the war, and so it put out the message that that freedom of speech might have its limits in times of war.
They were mostly self employed
The that is NOT a difference between parliamentary debate and both the policy and Lincoln-Douglass debates would be: <span>B. The parliamentary debate is the same as the Lincoln-Douglass debate style
The lincoln-douglass debate sytyle use one-versus-one format in the debate, meanwhile the Parliamentary debate style use two-versus-two format in the debate.</span>
The code of Hammurabi and Chinese legalism both rely on the idea that in order for a state or society to function well and properly, people need to follow a strict adherence to the rules of the state.
