1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Goryan [66]
3 years ago
8

True or false -

History
2 answers:
AlexFokin [52]3 years ago
5 0
I believe true... I mean if the story do end as archaeologists
Elenna [48]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is true that written accounts, objects and buildings are some examples of the types of evidence that allow archaeologists to study the past. In fact, archaeology is the branch of knowledge that studies human activity through such artifacts, known as "material culture." The examination of such items allow archaeologists to understand how different people interacted with their environment and with each other in the past.

You might be interested in
What do peasant farmers do when they lost their crops?
Talja [164]

Answer:

What do peasant farmers do when they lost their crops?

Peasant farmers often depended on <em>subsistence agriculture</em> - this means that the farmers primarily grew crops to feed themselves and their families, rather than selling their crops for economic gain.

So, if the peasant farmers lose their crops, they will have nothing to eat. The peasants will probably go hungry and perhaps starve.

And what common pattern do we see when the masses are starving? They <em>revolt </em>! I suppose that's a bit of a stretch, but in general, the peasant class would definitely be upset at having no crops to feed themselves and their children. Such tensions will be directed at their leader or "King" who is supposed to be prepared for any disaster.

Wouldn't people think, "The leader has everything he wants and can get anything he does not have, can't he share with us?"

Anyways, that's how I would interpret this question.

Hope this helps!

:D

7 0
2 years ago
16. How did Socrates lay the foundation for Plato's writings?
mamaluj [8]

Answer:

How Socrates laid the foundation for Plato's writings is:

B. Socrates began a school where he educated students like Plato, laying the foundations for his own branch of philosophy.

Explanation:

Plato (428 - 348) learned from Socrates (470—399 b.c.).  Socrates emphasized importance of ethics and politics for an individual to achieve correct living.  In his teachings and thoughts, Socrates questioned everything.  When he was imprisoned for his socratic ways and philosophies, Plato concentrated his attention and writings on living a virtuous life, as taught by Socrates.  However, since Socrates emphasized face to face communication, Plato toiled with the idea of writing down the socratic ethics and politics.  He had many philosophical writings attributed to him, especially on metaphysics and epistemology.  Plato was the teacher of Aristotle (384 - 322 b.c.).

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was NOT a purpose of the propaganda campaign?
Hatshy [7]
To answer your second question, women were NOT required to work in factories. They decided to work there to help because all the men went off to war so the answer is "unmarried women were required to work in factories" 
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"Pickett's Charge" was one of the Confederate attempts to win the battle. What area of the battle, also an important math term,
Iteru [2.4K]

Answer:

Cemetery Hill

Explanation:

The Pickett's Charge was a attack or charged that is made on foot by the soldiers during the battle of Gettysburg against Major General George Meade's Union made by Confederate Robert Lee.

The Charge was made by Major General George Pickett, who was one of the three Confederate Generals that led the assault or the war under Longstreet. And so it was known as 'Pickett's Charge'.

It was a part of the Lee's plan to conquer the Cemetery Hills of Gettysburg and take control of it. It was known as the high water mark of the Confederacy, which was the farthest point reached by the attack.

5 0
2 years ago
How did french nationalism increase tensions in europe?france was a strong supporter of pan-slavism.france considered alsace and
Alona [7]
Nationalism has increased the tensions among nations in Europe. The main reason for this is that this resulted in intense competition among these nations. Each wanted to overpower one another. In French nationalism, what resulted to this nationalism is that, France and Germany became rivals in face for naval superiority. The answer is the last option.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • AP US History question:
    15·1 answer
  • During World War I, buying war bonds was a way for people to
    9·2 answers
  • Is this quotation a reliable source for historians to use if they are writing about the death of Julius Caesar?
    7·1 answer
  • Americans participate in community groups at more than twice the rate of europeans because
    13·1 answer
  • One of the four items that follow is a fragment. Choose the fragment. Group of answer choices It was the first Japanese city to
    5·1 answer
  • Minority groups rallied behind what slogan?
    5·2 answers
  • Big Stick (El Gran Garrote) y la diplomacia del dólar. ¿En qué se<br> diferenciaban?
    13·1 answer
  • Since Congress has criminalized certain drug activities, under the supremacy clause states may not also criminalize these same d
    8·1 answer
  • I have to write and essay on some positive and negative effects of Globalization. Also how these effects change the way we buy c
    11·1 answer
  • What did Cortés do when the Spanish Governor arrived in Mexico?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!