Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
A car purchase would be an example of a short term financial goal.
Answer:A.They can harm consumers by fixing prices.
Answer:
Journal Entry
General Ledger Dr. Cr.
Cash $7,085
Sales Tax Payable $585
Sales $6,500
Explanation:
Sales tax is the amount of tax collected by the business on the taxable sales from customers on behalf of government and pay it to government after that. Sales tax will be included in the cash received from the customer and recorded as the payable for the business.
Sales Value = $6,500
Sales Tax = 9%
Sales inclusive of Sales tax = $6,500 x 109% = $6,500 x 1.09 = $7,085