<u>Answer</u>
<em>They are intended to illustrate that no right available to an individual or group is or can be absolute. The reality that human rights are not absolute, and are subject to reasonable restrictions, does not mean that the rights can be arbitrarily curtailed according to legislative or bureaucratic discretion.</em>
<em>Hope this helps! <3</em>
Answer:
1. Yes
2. Yes
Explanation:
Third-person narration gives credibility to the narrator. This is because third-person narrations provide a complete overview of all the factors that make up the story, which are told in an impartial way. With that, we know that the narrator is not shaping the story at his pleasure, but explaining the facts in an omnipresent and coherent way within the story. It all provides trust and credibility.
However, although first-person narrators, even though they are less reliable, they manage to make the reader feel strong empathy. This is because the first-person narrator is able to explain his feelings and emotions in a profound way, since he knows them intensely, even if he is not narrating true facts.
Answer:
(600 Kurdish villages were burned down and around 200,000 Kurds were deported to the other parts of the country.)
Question: Which event immediately followed the storming of the Bastille?
Options: A. Peasants began attacking the aristocracy. (True)
B. Louis XVI stepped down. (False)
C. The Estates-General was dissolved. (False)
D.Government troops attacked the National Assembly. (False)
Peasants began attacking the aristocracy.
Hope this helps!
