Answer:
Dr Cash $4,018
Dr Sales discounts $82
Cr Accounts receivable $4,100
Explanation:
Based on the information given The Appropriate journal entry that Smart makes on February 8 is:
February 8
Dr Cash $4,018
Dr Sales discounts $82
Cr Accounts receivable $4,100
Workings:
Sales Discounts = $4,100 × .02
Sales Discounts= $82
Cash = $4,100 − $82
Cash = $4018
<span>This is incorrect. Henry is actually demonstrating fine motor skills. Gross motor skills are those skills that pertain to large movements like walking, balance, jumping, etc. Fine motor skills are those that pertain to fine manipulation like writing, picking up small objects (like the cheerrios), or tying a knot.</span>
Answer:show up on time, accept overtime
Explanation:
Answer:
a. the buyer’s consumer surplus for that good is maximized.
Explanation:
The consumer will purchase up to the moment at whose preference price matches the market price.
Because of the diminished return theory, the following unit (k+1) will have a lower benefit to the consumer thus, it will have purchased only if the price is lower. Therefore, it will not purchase as the market price is the same as the previous unit but the consumer benefit is lower.
Answer:
Yeah, her argument will be good in Aceves. The further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
The promissory clause applies to just the requirement that although no attorney seems to be legal, a commitment is actionable. This happens whenever the Promiser already made that commitment to something like the Promisee who performs mostly on commitment.
- Aceves having operated throughout the specific situation mostly on the foundation of the Bank's commitment or withdrew its complaint. Therefore in this circumstance, the essential requirement that perhaps the promisee would have focused mostly on promiser is accomplished.
- Consecration of promise to pay estoppels is founded on either the ideals of equity as well as justice. The lender's action was unreasonable to Aceves and because of that, the premise would be effective on either the bank as to when the applicant was working on a pledge basis. Thus Aceves will be accurate in her argument.
