Answer:
The main difference between Federalists and Anti-Federalists at the time of the ratification of the Constitution of the United States was in the powers that the federal government would have compared to those of the states.
Thus, the Federalists defended the idea of a strong and comprehensive federal government, as described in the articles of the Constitution. In turn, the Anti-Federalists feared that this strong government could trample on the rights of citizens and state governments, thus fighting for the adoption of amendments that would guarantee these rights: the Bill of Rights.
Therefore, all writing that promoted a broad federal government and with great prerogatives would be Federalist, while all writing that defended the rights and powers of the states in particular would be Anti-Federalist.
Many say that Truman was justified in dropping the first bomb and it kept a land invasion of Japan from occurring but that he didn't give the Japanese enough time to surrender and that the second bomb was ethically problematic.
That building is Supreme court of the United states
<span>To ease trade restrictions over a 10-year-old limit
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was an agreement that began in 1994 between the North American nations of Canada, the United States and Mexico. It replaced an older agreement between the US and Canada and created a 3-way trade bloc intended to promote a mutual beneficial relationship of commerce across the continent.
</span>
