Answer:
My assumption is that the answer is 'Limits were needed on goods that were in short supply.'
Explanation:
this is because the War disrupted trade, limiting the availability of some goods.
Because they wanted 2 be free they no longer wanted 2 be under great britain's rule
Answer:
B- to define structure and power of government agencies
According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state <u>can not interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
The case of Gibbons and the Ogden was presented in the Supreme Court in the United States of America. It was in the year 1824 and was one of the most important cases of that time.
According to this case, a principle was established and it established a legislative enactment. According to this, a state could not interfere in the power of the congress and the power that was talked about in this principle was about interfering with the regulation of the commerce. It was only in the hand of the congress and not with the states.
