By questioning the proposal done by Hugh, Irene showed the characteristic of being able to scrutinize properly certain things. This attitude is helpful especially when we are in doubt of the certain subject. By doing so, we can help those who proposed it to further do improvements on the certain subject.
In order to ship 107520 units, 107520 units need to be picked as well
In the Picking team, 1 worker picks 210 units in 1 hour
So, the number of units picked by 1 worker in a shift of 8 hours = 210 * 8 = 1680 units
So, the number of employees required to be assigned to the Picking team = Quantity to be picked / Number of units picked by 1 worker in a shift of 8 hours = 107520 / 1680 = 64.03571 = 64
The number of employees to be assigned to picking in order to ship a total of 107,520 units for the shift is 64.
The gadgets for measuring periods are millimeter (mm), centimeter (cm), meter (m), and kilometer (km). The devices for measuring weight are kilogram (kg) and gram (g). The gadgets for measuring extent are milliliter (ml) and liter (L).
While the costs or value of manufacturing of an item is divided by means of the quantity, the end result is called a unit fee. Context: The unit price of a set of homogeneous products is the entire fee of the purchases/sales divided with aid of the sum of the quantities.
Learn more about the unit here:
brainly.com/question/25862883
#SPJ4
Answer:
Expected number of orders=31.6 orders per year
Explanation:
<em>The expected number of orders would be the Annual demand divided by the economic order quantity(EOQ).</em>
<em>The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is the order quantity that minimizes the balance of holding cost and ordering cost. At the EOQ, the holding cost is exactly the same as the ordering cost.</em>
It is calculated as follows:
EOQ = (2× Co D)/Ch)^(1/2)
Co- ordering cost Ch - holding cost, D- annual demand
EOQ = (2× 10 × 100000/2)^(1/2)= 3162.27 units
Number of orders = Annual Demand/EOQ
= 100,000/3,162.27= 31.62 orders
Expected number of orders=31.6 orders per year
Answer:
EAW = -$17,545.71
Explanation:
initial investment = $200,000
cash inflows;
- Year 1 = $33,000
- Year 2 = $44,000
- Year 3 = $55,000
- Year 4 = $66,000
- Year 5 = $77,000
- Year 6 = $88,000
- Year 7 = $99,000
- Year 8 = $110,000
- Year 9 = $132,000
cash outflows:
- Year 1 = $20,000
- Year 2 = $30,000
- Year 3 = $40,000
- Year 4 = $50,000
- Year 5 = $60,000
- Year 6 = $70,000
- Year 7 = $80,000
- Year 8 = $90,000
- Year 9 = $100,000
EAW = equivalent annual worth = equivalent annual benefits - equivalent annual costs
to determine the EAB we must first find the PV of the cash inflows using a financial calculator = $408,348.84
EAB = (PV x r) / [1 - (1 + r)⁻ⁿ] = ($408,348.84 x 10%) / [1 - (1 + 10%)⁻⁹] = $70,905.91
to determine the EAC we must first find the PV of the cash outflows (including initial outlay) using a financial calculator = $509,395
EAC = (PV x r) / [1 - (1 + r)⁻ⁿ] = ($509,395 x 10%) / [1 - (1 + 10%)⁻⁹] = $88,451.62
EAW = $70,905.91 - $88,451.62 = -$17,545.71
Answer:
A share of Citigroup stock represents a claim on Citigroup's assets that gives the purchaser a share of the corporation.
Depending on whether you are an investor or the corporation, a bond is more or less riskier than a stock.
If you are an investor, buying a bond is safer than buying stock since in a worse case scenario where the company goes bankrupt, bond holders are paid before than stockholders. Also bonds provide fixed periodic payments (coupons) and a final payment of the face of the bond at maturity date.
If you are the corporation, issuing bonds is riskier than issuing stock since you have the obligation of making fixed periodic payments to bondholders (coupons) and must pay the face value at maturity date. On the other hand corporations don't have any legal obligation to pay dividends.
