Graph C since the dot is open so it’s not equal and it’s -2 is the biggest so the arrow faces that direction
Answer:
a, Row 1 = 30 seats
Row 2 = 32 seats
Row 3 = 34 seats
Row 4 = 36 seats
b, n + equidistant number of seats added each row (2) * number of row - 1
c, 58 seats
Step-by-step explanation:
a, Because the seats is increasing by 2 after every row after row 1
Therefore, row 2 = row 1 + 2 = 30+2 = 32 seats
Row 3 = Row 2 + 2 =32+2 =34 seats
Row 4 = Row 3 + 2 = 34 + 2 = 36 seats
b, The explicit rule for the number of seats would be:
Row 1 = n
Row 2 = n + equidistant number of seats added each row (2) * (2-1) = n + 2
Row 3 = n+ equidistant number of seats added each row (2) * (3-1) = n+ 4
Row 4 = n + equidistant number of seats added each row(2) * (4-1) = n+6
etc.....
c, The number of seats in the 15th row would be = number of seat in the first row + equidistant number of seats added each row * 15 - 1 (first row)
= 30 + 2 * 14= 30 + 28 = 58 seats
Hope this help you :3
Let "x" be the positive integer
Twenty times a square of a positive integer plus 50:
20x² + 50
Negative 40 times the square of the positive integer plus one-hundred and ten times the positive integer:
-40x² + 100x
The equation could be used is shown below:
20x² + 50 = -40x² +100x
20x² + 40x² -100x + 50 = 0
60x² - 100x +50 =0
Answer:
And for this case we want to test the following hypothesis:
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis: 
For this case since the lower value of the confidence interval is higher than 42000 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at the 55 of significance and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly different from 42000
Step-by-step explanation:
The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:
(1)
And for this case the 95% confidence interval is already calculated as:
And for this case we want to test the following hypothesis:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
For this case since the lower value of the confidence interval is higher than 42000 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at the 55 of significance and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly different from 42000
the answer would be B because if you imput the variables the equation comes out equal.
