Answer:
Inventory= $251,540
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Swifty Company took a physical inventory on December 31 and determined that goods costing $203,600 were on hand. Not included in the physical count were $25,420 of goods purchased from Pelzer Corporation, f.o.b. shipping point, and $22,520 of goods sold to Alvarez Company for $32,230, f.o.b. destination.
Both the purchase and the sale must be accounted for in inventory. The purchase is FOB shipping point, therefore it is responsibility os Swifty. The sale was made FOB destination, as it is in transit, it is the responsibility of Swifty.
Inventory= 203,600 + 25,420 + 22,520= $251,540
Is this supposed to be a multiple choice question? It is way fun to think about projects other people might be up to which carry outrageously high risk!
Restaurants are a common example -- there's a little bit of magic in whether a new restaurant will catch on and become popular.
Farming is pretty risky. You can do everything right and have a hail storm come and ruin the crops. That's why there are government programs and commodity markets that help farmers mitigate their risk -- because the rest of us who need to eat really need for people to be willing to farm!
Answer:
depends on the disability
Explanation:
depending on what kind of disability they have, people with disabilities cant do certain things
Answer:
a. Common stock acquired by the company in the open market & recorded as negative equity
Explanation:
A stock which is buy back from the market at market rate issued by the company. It reduces the total outstanding shares of the company. It is the difference of Number of share issued and Number of share outstanding. Its account is consider as contra equity account. So the correct option is a. Common stock acquired by the company in the open market & recorded as negative equity.
Answer:
According to F.A. Hayek, the fundamental problem facing every society is how to use limited resources in the most optimal way possible.
Explanation:
To Hayek, this problem could not be fully solved by any society, but the best a society could do is to rely on the price system, only possible under a free market, to signal which uses were more optimal than others.
This is also the reason why F.A. Hayek, along with fellow Austrian economists Ludwing Von Mises, believe that socialism could not work: socialism, according to Hayek and Mises, destroyes the price system, and without it, society has no rational way to allocate resources in an optimal way.
