What was the overall purpose for the emancipation proclamation?
Answer: The Emancipation Proclamation was an executive order issued by Abraham Lincoln on January 1, 1863. It proclaimed the freedom of slaves in the ten Confederate states still in rebellion. It also decreed that freed slaves could be enlisted in the Union Army, thereby increasing the Union's available manpower.
So I think it would be: to end slavery everywhere in union
Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong!
Answer:
Psychotic feature
Explanation:
Depression with psychotic features is called major depression. This is a very critical condition and needs immediate treatment with medication and psychotherapies. Major depression is a critical mental condition. It affects a person in all areas of life such as interpersonal relationships, workplace, social relations, etc. It affects the mood as well as the appetite and libido of a person.
<u>Symptoms of major depression:
</u>
- Irritability
- Lack of concentration
- Social isolation
- Helpless, worthless, hopeless
- Change appetite
- Too much or too little sleep.
Answer:
a letter from the Spanish ambassador
Explanation:
- On 9 February 1898, Spanish Ambassador Enrique Dupuy de Lome wrote a letter to Spanish Foreign Minister Don Jose Canalezas, expressing De Laum view of Spanish involvement in Cuba and US President McKinley's diplomacy.
- In the letter, Spanish Ambassador Enrique Dupuy de Lome criticized US President William McKinley, urging the audience to favour only the weak and agitated.
- The words included in the publicly seized Spanish letter caused an international uproar, which contributed to anti-Spanish and anti-war sentiment in the United States.
- The publication of the letter brought public support to the Spanish colony Cuba in its war against Spain over independence.
<span>ART BY THOMAS POROSTOCKY</span>PRO: RESEARCH ON GENE EDITING IN HUMANS MUST CONTINUE
By John Harris
<span>John Harris is professor emeritus in science ethics at University of Manchester, U.K., and the author of How to be Good, Oxford University Press 2016.</span>
In February of this year, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority in the United Kingdom approved a request by the Francis Crick Institute in London to modify human embryos using the new gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9. This is the second time human embryos have been employed in such research, and the first time their use has been sanctioned by a national regulatory authority. The scientists at the Institute hope to cast light on early embryo development—work which may eventually lead to safer and more successful fertility treatments.
The embryos, provided by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, will not be allowed to develop beyond seven days. But in theory—and eventually in practice—CRISPR could be used to modify disease-causing genes in embryos brought to term, removing the faulty script from the genetic code of that person’s future descendants as well. Proponents of such “human germline editing” argue that it could potentially decrease, or even eliminate, the incidence of many serious genetic diseases, reducing human suffering worldwide. Opponents say that modifying human embryos is dangerous and unnatural, and does not take into account the consent of future generations.
I believe the answer is: -ensuring one party controls the House and the other party controls the Senate
The people who controlled the house and senate are determined by the legal voters, no the legislative branch. The legislative branch only focused itself in identifying the type of regulations that are necessary for the people to help address the issue that they experienced.
