1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uysha [10]
4 years ago
13

In many industrialized areas of the world, privatization has been the norm for about 30 years. In which of the following areas i

s this not the case?
A. Latin America
B. France
C. China
D. The United Kingdom
History
1 answer:
Aloiza [94]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Latin America

Explanation:

In Latin America, citizens are opposed to government privatization policies. The more educated Latin Americans are, the lesser their support for privatization of state-owned means of production. As a result of this, privatization is highly unpopular in Latin America.

Privatization has sparked large-scale protests in Latin America. A large majority of Latin Americans are of the opinion that privatization has not helped economic development of the region. The percentage of the Latin American population who hold this view has been increasing steadily in recent years.

While privatization has been the norm in many industrialized nations, the same can not be said concerning Latin America.

You might be interested in
Summarize what was the purpose of the homestead act
Grace [21]

Answer:

The Homestead Act was a law passed by Congress in 1862 that granted 160 acres of federal land to any U.S. citizen. An individual was given ownership of the land for free if that person lived on the land for five years and improved the land by building a home and producing a crop. The 1862 Homestead Act accelerated settlement of U.S. western territory by allowing any American, including freed slaves, to put in a claim for up to 160 free acres of federal land.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the roles of slaves and freemen in the Roman Republic.
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

1. Roman slavery was not based on race so sometimes it was hard to differ if someone was a slave or not (everyone looked similar).

2. Both roles are pretty similar except for the fact that slaves are forced into labor work and freed men work on their own free will and are treated better.

3. Slaves are abused and treated badly and freemen aren't.

4. Slaves were used in all forms of work except for public office.

5. Often times employed men and slaves would work together except that the free employed men would get paid and the slaves wouldn't (this usually happened when one cannot find enough slaves to work and can only conclude to using paid workers so that's when they end up getting mixed together).

The role of slaves and freemen seem very similar in a lot of aspects (despite the fact that slaves cannot work in public office) but they are ranked by their parents (if your parents are slaves then you're born a slave) and slaves can also be chosen out of something like a battle. If they lose they are taken in as slaves. What I'm trying to say is that freedom was not a right but a privilege for people in the Roman Republic. Things like battles were used to justify and confirm superiority over the losers and gave the winners divine right to rule over the losers (slaves) and treat them badly. At a point the slaves were practically invisible.

Explanation:

ik know i already answer this one but can you give brainlist again

4 0
2 years ago
Which 17th century enlightenment philosophers inspired the ideas in the declaration?
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

Most scholars today believe that Jefferson derived the most famous ideas in the Declaration of Independence from the writings of English philosopher John Locke. Locke wrote his Second Treatise of Government in 1689 at the time of England's Glorious Revolution, which overthrew the rule of James II.

7 0
3 years ago
Which source would best help a historian understand the effect of the Great Chicago Fire on families?
vazorg [7]

is there a multiple

6 0
4 years ago
What is the Summary of the resurrection?
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

According to google "Summary of the Resurrection"

Explanation:

"The resurrection of Jesus, or anastasis, is the Christian belief that God raised Jesus on the third day after his crucifixion at Calvary as first of the dead, starting his exalted life as Christ and Lord." (wiki)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I Will give 50 points and brainliest to whoever answers right and first Which was not a origin of world war 2
    5·1 answer
  • (Civics)
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following arguments is an argument of value?
    13·2 answers
  • Herbert Hoover lost the 1932 presidential election to _____. Calvin Coolidge Harry Truman Warren Harding Franklin Roosevelt HELP
    7·2 answers
  • This is the correct answer
    12·1 answer
  • What kinds of services do financial institutions such as banks and savings and loans offer?
    15·1 answer
  • Where did the highest concentration of cities in Mesopotamia emerge?
    12·1 answer
  • Can please help me with this
    5·1 answer
  • By the end of the war, the Austro-Hungarian Empire had?
    5·1 answer
  • 1. How does the Dominican Republic differ from the US in how skin color
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!