1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rus_ich [418]
2 years ago
15

Why do many people still argue about the decision to drop atomic bombs on japan in 1945 apex?

History
2 answers:
Ratling [72]2 years ago
6 0

During World War II, the United States of America, who were part of the military alliance called Allies, launched two atomic attacks on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

There is plenty of discussion on whether the Atomic Attack was necessary or not, since the Allies were in a position of strength, and about to win the war.

However, the atomic attacks were also a response to the Pearl Harbor attack, and eventually led to Japanese surrender and the defeat of the Axis.

Softa [21]2 years ago
4 0
<span>People still argue about it mainly because of the population that we dropped it on being mainly civilian , There is also a argument that we should not have dropped the second bomb</span>
You might be interested in
When does Country X have an absolute advantage over Country Y in the
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

B. Country X can grow corn more cheaply than Country Y

Explanation:

If you can grow corn cheaper then you have an advantage.

3 0
2 years ago
Look at the change in population in Europe from 1300 to 1400, during the Black Death epidemic. Use a calculator to determine the
yarga [219]

Answer:

The percentage of the European population who died due to the black death ranges from 30 to 50%, and in some urban areas, especially in southern European countries like Italy, 60-70 and even 80% of the population died.

The black death was very contagious, had an extremely high mortality rate, and medicine at the time had no means to combat the disease, hence the very high death toll of the plague.

5 0
3 years ago
Which statement best explains why tension grew between European leaders over colonialism in Africa?
Lorico [155]

The statement that best explains why tension grew between European leaders over colonialism in Africa is: "Some were angered because other nations took over their colonies." Option D is correct.

Between the 1870s and 1900, Africa coped to European imperialist aggression, diplomatic pressures, military invasions, and eventual conquest and colonization.

The European imperialist push into Africa was motivated by three main factors, economic, political, and social.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Belief in witchcraft was not a common feature of Puritan religious life.<br> T/f?
valentina_108 [34]
True it was not common
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What two purposes is the state of the union given ?
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

Constitution states that the president “shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.”

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When studying cause and effect, historians usually group the causes into different categories. For example, cultural causespolit
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following did Qin Shi Huangdi not standardize?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the Corps of Discovery?
    11·1 answer
  • how did the hebrew approach to god and to divine sanctions for good behavior compare with egyptain religion?
    9·1 answer
  • During the mid-1930s, which characteristic was common to Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, and Communist Russia?
    11·1 answer
  • 1. What was the Constitutional Convention? When was it held? Who called for it?​
    15·1 answer
  • What is the name of the Islamic fundamentalist group that ruled Afghanistan from 1996 until 2001?
    5·2 answers
  • Need help now! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 50 POINTS Write a thesis statement about the Japanese Americans encampment in the US.
    15·1 answer
  • In _____ the High Court of Australia recognized a family's claim to land they had worked for generations.
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!