Why do many people still argue about the decision to drop atomic bombs on japan in 1945 apex?

2 answers:

6 0

During World War II, the United States of America, who were part of the military alliance called Allies, launched two atomic attacks on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

There is plenty of discussion on whether the Atomic Attack was necessary or not, since the Allies were in a position of strength, and about to win the war.

However, the atomic attacks were also a response to the Pearl Harbor attack, and eventually led to Japanese surrender and the defeat of the Axis.

Softa [21]3 years ago

4 0

<span>People still argue about it mainly because of the population that we dropped it on being mainly civilian , There is also a argument that we should not have dropped the second bomb</span>

You might be interested in

Most Nazi soldiers died fighting _____________?

Blababa [14]

Most Nazi soldiers died fighting were killed fighting the Red Army, who fought for the The USSR (Soviet Union) in World War two. Nazi Germany also lost about three million soliders in World War two.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did Russia obtain control of the Bering Strait? a. They defeated the Ottoman Turks for it. c. They made a treaty with China

erma4kov [3.2K]

C. They made a treaty with China to explore the area

7 0

3 years ago

Which monarch freed the serfs?

Y_Kistochka [10]

King Joseph the 2nd in Australia

6 0

3 years ago

How did the discovery of the Rosetta Stone change historical conclusion about ancient Egypt

cricket20 [7]

ability to understand hieroglyphs vastly increased our knowledge of the civilization of ancient Egypt
helped scholars at long last crack the code of hieroglyphics

hope it helps :)

4 0

3 years ago

‘The Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Germany.' How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer”

Paraphin [41]

Answer:

It can be viewed in opposite opinions, so I'll do both, and you can choose which one you use- you could use both, which would detail your answer more, and ensure you get top marks.

Explanation:

On one hand, I disagree that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Germany. After majorly contributing to the start of World War I, causing mass destruction to numerous countries, they deserved a severe punishment to face their consequences, which included reparations, loss of their territory, and regulations on the size of their army. It was right for them to be punished so harshly, so they could learn not to cross the Allies again.

On the other hand, I agree that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Germany. Despite contributing to a war, every country was involved, so it is not right Germany are the ones getting severely punished. The punishments are too harsh and majorly damaged the country's economy, and I feel this is too hard on Germany.

Hope this helps!

3 0

3 years ago