<span>Allied leaders met to discuss a postwar settlement and they agreed on five principles
1. Germany remains single country
2. Germany must be demilitarized
3. Outlaw Nazi Party
4. Rebuild German political structure
5. Anyone responsible for war crimes should be trialed.</span>
Answer:
No, Napoleon's rule definitely did not represent the fulfillment of the French Revolution ideals, because the French Revolution was a liberal revolution, in the sense that it sought the establishment of a new rule where personal liberties where respected, where people were equal before the law, and where the government was accountable to the people, and served the people.
Explanation:
Napoleon on the other hand, was simply a dictator. Perhaps a very skilled and smart dictator, but a dictator nonetheless. He was not accountable to the people, and could do with the country what he pleased. He got France involved in a series of wars (the Napoleonic Wars), imposed his dictatorial rule over most of Western Europe, and caused the dead of thousands of soldiers with his disastrous decision to invade Russia.
Napoleon was like a new monarch, and the French Revolution was so contrary to the monarchy that its leaders beheaded the last French King: Louis XVI. For all these reasons, Napoleon was the opposite to what the French Revolution sought.
1. One who rules a country or colony by the authority of his king
2. Claimed land in the Ohio valley for France - Celoran.
3. Founded New Orleans - De Bienville.
4. Bought Manhattan Island - Minuit.
5. Leader of Jamestown - Smith.
6. Successfully planted and cured tobacco - Rolfe.
7. Wanted to separate from the Anglican - Pilgrims.
8. Wanted to change the Anglican Church from within - Puritans.
9. Religious group teaching brotherly love - Quackers.
10. Dutch governor of New Amsterdam in 1664 - Stuyvesant.
11. Taught Pilgrims planting techniques
President Kennedy handled the Cuban Missile Crisis<span> bravely at the time in a confrontational manner. ... by revisionist historians that </span>do<span> not critically review the event to the correct historical context</span>