In case A, as the error would be a difference of 1, the assumption could be mantained, but in case B the difference will be bigger, showing that the ratio is not 3:1 but 4:1.
<h3><u>Ratios</u></h3>
Given that a preliminary study was carried out to test the hypothesis that the ratio of white to dark herons on the island was 3:1, but A) a small census found 16 white morphs and 4 dark, to determine if the assumption of a 3 :1 ratio could be rejected, and B) to determine the same question if the census were larger with 160 white morphs and 40 dark, the following calculations must be made:
A)
- 3 + 1 = 4
- 16 + 4 = 20
- 4 = 20
- 3 = X
- 60 / 4 = X
- 15 = X
- Therefore, as the error would be a difference of 1, the assumption could be mantained.
B)
- 3 + 1 = 4
- 160 + 40 = 200
- 150 = 3:1
- In this case, the difference will be bigger, showing that the ratio is not 3:1 but 4:1.
Learn more about ratios in brainly.com/question/1504221
Answer:
30 is the wrong one because it is not a factor of 100
30 60 90 120
20 40 60 80 100
Step-by-step explanation:
The second equation, its setup is correct
Answer:
2. 1- Experimental probability of rolling a 4 = 40%
3. 2- Theoretical probability is 3% greater than experimental probability.
Step-by-step explanation:
Experimental probability of rolling a 4 = 100 × 
= 100 × 0.4
= 40%
Experimental probability of getting at least one tail = 
= 0.72
Theoretical probability of getting at least one tail = 
= 0.75
Theoretical probability is 3% greater than experimental probability.
Answer: i would say that i think its x
Step-by-step explanation:
