Answer:
$2.835 in March and $0 in May.
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
The actual method of accounting is that the revenue is not recognized in the period when the actual cash is received but the period in which it is earned.Hence, May-31 income statement will not recognize any part of revenue and March-31 income statement will recognize the whole revenue of $2.835 million.
Hence, $2.835 in March and $0 in May.
If Natasha can produce either 5,000 pounds of cheese or 20 houses per year and Jameson can produce either 5,000 pounds of cheese or 10 houses per year then,
- Natasha has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese.
- Jameson has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese.
<h3>What is comparative advantage?</h3>
The ability of an economy to produce a specific good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its trading counterparts is known as comparative advantage.
The example of comparative advantage is-
- For instance, if a nation excels in producing both cheese and chocolate, they can choose to allocate the appropriate amount of labour to each product.
- This nation has a comparative advantage in producing chocolate if it takes one hour of labour to make 10 units of cheese and one hour of labour to produce 20 units of chocolate.
The importance of comparative advantage are-
- Ability to create a good or service for a lower opportunity cost is a benefit of comparative advantage.
- Companies with a comparative advantage are able to sell their products and services for less than their rivals do, resulting in higher profit margins and stronger sales margins.
To know more about lower opportunity cost, here
brainly.com/question/481029
#SPJ4
Answer: The journal entry for Nelson company are as follows uses a perpetual inventory system:
Info General Journal Debit Credit
a Store Supplies expense $1,750
To Store Supplies $1,750
b Insurance Expense $1,400
To Prepaid Insurance $1,400
c Depreciation expense $1,525
To Accumulated Depreciation - Store equipment $1,525
d Cost of goods sold $10,900
To Merchandize Inventory $10,900
Answer:
A Tying Contract
Explanation:
If a seller requires an intermediary to purchase a supplementary product to qualify to purchase the primary product the intermediary wishes to buy, it results in a tying contract. It is mostly treated as an illegal because it pushes intermediary organization to buy other products if they wishes to purchase the products which is actually needed to be purchased. Some companies make it compulsory for their intermediaries in doing so. For example, if you have to buy 10 packs of Lays, then you must be buying 5 extra boxes of Pepsi as well. It is being done because of the power and market share that company is enjoying in the market, so they take its advantage.