(C) is the answer hope it helps
University of oslo auditorium. Oslo, Norway
Here are the arguments for both sides:
1) Federalists:
-- Felt that the Constitution was necessary, as it gave the federal government more power than the Articles of Confederation.
--Having a weak federal government was a bad idea, as this concept did not work well when the Articles of Confederation were implemented.
-- Having no executive branch (president) made it difficult to develop a clear sense of direction for the nation. Using the new constitution would fix this problem.
2) Anti-Federalist:
-- Believed that the federal government had too much power.
-- Anti-federalists believed that a strong federal government could result in corruption.
--Anti-federalists also feared the federal government would not consider the needs/wants of the citizens, as this is what the British government did right before America declared their independence.
Election of British colonists to Parliament was non-existent when it came to the American colonies, which was the leading factor that cause the colonies to declare independence.
