Answer:a.
It would increase by $500,000 multiplied by the reciprocal of the required reserve ratio.
Explanation:
A bank will often hold government securities as an asset. If a bank were to sell S500,000 in government securities to an individual who paid for the bond in cash and the bank placed this cash in its vault, by how much would the money supply change as a result - It would increase by $500,000 multiplied by the reciprocal of the required reserve ratio.
The money supply is the entire stock of currency and other liquid instruments circulating in a country's economy and is given by the formula:
MONEY SUPPLY = RESERVES X MONEY MULTIPLIER
Therefore the bank reserves increasing in the scenario will increase money supplier by the effect of the money multiplier or the reciprocal of the required reserve ratio.
Answer:
(D) $71,446
Explanation:
we will calcualte the present value for an 11 payments annuity-due (there is eleven payment of 10,000 if we count the one at purchase date) which couta is 10,000 discounted at 10%
C 10,000
time 11
rate 0.1
PV $71,445.6711
rounding to the nearest dollars: 71,446
The answer is "trade barriers"
The statement, "The purchase of treasury stock usually restricts the amount of retained earnings available for cash dividends." is true
.
Option a
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The stock in the bank is the term for originally sold securities that the issuing firm has retained. If a corporation sells some of its released and outstanding securities, the sale drastically alters its retained profits.
As the balance sheet show all remaining earnings and the equity fund, sums available to pay dividends drop. The price of the stock in treasury should be reduced by the retained revenues, which reduce the amounts that the business can dividend to shareholders.
Sometimes a business needs the share-earnings ratio to be improved. If a company bought out many of its own shares, it reduces the number of released and outstanding activities raises the earnings per stake in the company and makes the assets more appealing for buyers.
Answer:
c. corporate officers.
Explanation:
In the case when the potential obligation is to be avoided for any misconduct while having operations in the corporate so the directors could refrain from the supervision of the delegated work to the corporate officers so that the work could not harm that result in help in attains the goals & objectives
Therefore the option c is correct