Answer:
payback 5 years
if the ltaer years cash flow increases several times, it would not affect the payback date. This is a disavantage of this method, it is focus on recover the investment without considering the total cash flow of the project.
Explanation:
Payback = the time in the life of a project on which the initial ivnestment is recover.
-31,000 Balance
Year 1 2,000 - 29,000
Year 2 0 - 29,000
Year 3 8,000 - 21,000
Year 4 9,000 - 12,000
Year 5 12,000 0
At year 5 the proejct achieve payback
Answer:
D. Absolute Advantage
Explanation:
Absolute advantage represents an economics principle referring to the capability of a firm or a country or even an individual to manufacture or produce a larger quantity of a product or offer a greater quantity of a service than its competitors especially with the same amount of resource which in in reference to international trade is labour.
The absolute advantage for Russia in the question is that it has the only deposits of Yuksporite and using the same amount of labour input other countries would have used, Russia has the absolute advantage as the only manufacturer of goods that would come out of Yuksporite.
Please give the options in order for us to determine which is best.
from Intelligent’s point of view, this bond would be considered a current asset, because it represents a resource that can easily be converted to cash within one year.
A bond is a debt instrument. A bondholder is entitled to regular predetermined interest rate payments and at the end of the bond's tenure, the bondholder would receive the amount invested.
Current assets are assets that are expected to be sold, used, or exhausted through standard business operations with one year.
Examples of current asset are:
- cash
- cash equivalents
- accounts receivable
- stock inventory
- marketable securities
- pre-paid liabilities
To learn more, please check: brainly.com/question/14287268
<span>The researcher has violated participant confidentiality and has made the validity of the study invalid. The people whose confidentiality was breached should be notified and they should have the right to revoke their information from the study. No one who believes they have participated with confidentiality should be subjected to having others know they were involved if they do not want that.</span><span />