In accordance with <em>propositional</em> logic, <em>quantifier</em> theory and definitions of <em>simple</em> and <em>composite</em> propositions, the negation of a implication has the following equivalence:
(Correct choice: iii)
<h3>How to find the equivalent form of a proposition</h3>
Herein we have a <em>composite</em> proposition, that is, the union of <em>monary</em> and <em>binary</em> operators and <em>simple</em> propositions. According to <em>propositional</em> logic and <em>quantifier</em> theory, the negation of an implication is equivalent to:
To learn more on propositions: brainly.com/question/14789062
#SPJ1
let the solution be 
let the solutions be a = 3, b = 1
is the equation with consistent value.
Answer: 945
Step-by-step explanation:
this month = 450.
next month 450x10/100=45, 450+45= 495
450+495= 945
Answer:
80
Step-by-step explanation:
It means that there are a third part of teddy bears, so
240 / 3 = 80
Answer: Darren
A) Job Offer #1 would be better financially until job offer 2 (in 12 years) would be a better and have more income, so IMO job offer #1 would set you better off financially
B) it would take 12 years for job offer #2 to become a better offer (you can also express this in your own words if needed)
