Answer:
Primary sources provide raw information and first-hand evidence. ... A primary source gives you direct access to the subject of your research. Secondary sources provide second-hand information and commentary from other researchers. Examples include journal articles, reviews, and academic books
Explanation:
Answer:
in my opinion vaccinations are a good idea, but how they are delivered is not the smartest. they put all sorts of animal and baby dna in the shot and then inject it into you.
Explanation:
having someone elses dna in you can affect you in a negative way.
As she is always the first to ask her coworkers they need help on anything, hence, we will describe Carla as a proactive person.
<h3>Who is a
proactive person?</h3>
A proactive person is someone who always gets ahead of a problem and takes extra measures to prevent a problem from occurring.
What are the other qualities of a proactive person?
- they are always step ahead of possible problems.
- they are always take measures to prevent a problem from arising.
- they are always controls a situation instead of reacting to it after the fact.
Read more about proactive person
<em>brainly.com/question/514851</em>
Answer:
The purpose of persuasion in writing is to convince, motivate, or move readers toward a certain point of view, or opinion. The act of trying to persuade automatically implies more than one opinion on the subject can be argued.
The idea of an argument often conjures up images of two people yelling and screaming in anger. In writing, however, an argument is very different. An argument is a reasoned opinion supported and explained by evidence. To argue in writing is to advance knowledge and ideas in a positive way. Written arguments often fail when they employ ranting rather than reasoning.
Most people have strong views on controversial topics (ones that inspire extreme points of view or opinions) and are often very willing to share those strong views. However, imagine you are having a discussion with someone who is only willing to share a particular point of view, ignoring yours, which may be in opposition. The ideas presented by that person would be very narrow, almost as if the person has tunnel vision and is merely expressing a personal opinion. If that person does provide you with facts, they may often be skewed or not from a credible source. After the discussion, there is only a slight chance you would be convinced of the other person’s point of view. You may have new ideas you had not considered before or a new perspective, but you would probably not be thoroughly convinced because that person has not made any attempt to present a well-rounded, fact-based point of view. This is why it is essential for you to not only provide your reader with strong, substantiated evidenced, but also to ensure you present an argument that looks at the topic
