The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
- North America has a long, rich history in ultrarunning, one that stretches back thousands of years. ... On their runs they would carry a dried buffalo heart. .... This ability to cover ground on foot was of paramount importance. ... The came over, when there was still ice connecting Asia to America, they came ...
<span>A prepositional phrase modifies a word and relates that word to the preposition's object.</span>
The repitition of these words continue to enhance that something bad or abusive happened to a person, animal or living thing.
