Wiglaf proves that he is honest and loyal because
- A. He follows through on his promise to fight with Beowulf even when Beowulf is not as strong
Wiglaf who was one of the soldiers in Beowulf's army promised to stand by him till they conquered Grendel. This promise was meant to be kept by the other soldiers in Beowulf's army.
However, their loyalty was to be tested when Beowulf's strength began to fail him during the battle with Grendel.
While the other soldiers ran away at that critical time, Wiglaf remained loyal to his master and stood by him till he died from the harm that was inflicted on him by Grendel.
Conclusively, Wiglaf proved that he was honest and loyal by keeping to his promise to remain with Beowulf.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/5380725
It will A. published or c.printed
I believe the answer would be C.Mournful
The dissenters in the flag-burning case and their supporters might at this juncture note an irony in my argument. My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of our self-conception and that commitment to it requires the rejection of official dogma. But how is that admittedly dogmatic belief different from any other dogma, such as the one inferring that freedom of expression stops at the border of the flag?
The crucial distinction is that the commitment to freedom of conscience and expression states the simplest and least self-contradictory principle that seems to capture our aspirations. Any other principle is hopelessly at odds with our commitment to freedom of conscience. The controversy surrounding the flag-burning case makes the case well.
The controversy will rage precisely because burning the flag is such a powerful form of communication. Were it not, who would care? Thus were we to embrace a prohibiton on such communication, we would be saying that the 1st Amendment protects expression only when no one is offended. That would mean that this aspect of the 1st Amendment would be of virtually no consequence. It would protect a person only when no protection was needed. Thus, we do have one official dogma-each American may think and express anything he wants. The exception is expression that involves the risk of injury to others and the destruction of someone else`s property. Neither was present in this case.
The answer is D because the author wants the reader to understand the central message of the passage.
