Answer: (E) Are you married
Explanation: if you look closley at all these questions you can see that if you were to check in to a hotel that all these things are appropriate to ask. But are you married is kind of personal to some people and it has to do nothing with checking in to a hotel
I hope i helped you you out a thank and a brainlist would be greatly appreciated :)
Answer and Explanation:
Respected Sir,
Sub: Absorption costing to analyze product costs and subsequent cost-volume-profit decisions
As per your requirement please find the explanation below:
Absorption costing is a process by which we add part of the fixed overhead to the production expense of the goods. If we do on a per-unit basis. Here we will compute by dividing the fixed costs by the number of units that we built and sold over the era. Whereas Variable costing includes fixed overhead as a lump sum instead of a per-unit price.
Under this process, all your variable costs like equipment, raw materials, and shipping are included. We will add the maximum fixed overhead costs for the duration. Such costs are not calculated on a per-unit basis. Rather than we deduct them as a lump-sum expense from your income amount.
Variable costing is really useful as it reveals the earnings after all the expenses are paid for the accounting period. While you would not have earned revenue for the goods we purchased as some may be in the inventory, we are showing you have paid all of your expenses for the time. We have excess revenue when you actually sell the finished goods in the warehouse.
The absorption approach is not all that effective as absorption costing will inflate the income figures excessively in any given span of accounting. Since you're not going to subtract any of your fixed costs as we did not sell any of us produced goods, our profit and loss report doesn't reflect the maximum expenses you've had for the time. Therefore, these results may mislead us when our profitability is analyzed.
Regards
ABC
Answer:
I= $1,600
Explanation:
We have to clear Investment from the GDP formula:
GDP= Consumption (C)+ Investment (I)+ Government expenditure (G)+ Net exports (exports-imports)
I=GDP-G-C-(X-M)
The problem gives this information:
GDP: $10,000
G: $2,000
C: $6,000
X: $1,000
M: $600
I= $10,000-$2,000-$6,000-($1,000-$600)
Investment in 2010=$1,600
Answer:
A. Wait for real-world events to confirm or refute the hypothesis.
B. Conduct one or more experiments.
Explanation:
Hypothesis by economists can lead to results that can decide economic policy. As such, it is important that they are tried and tested.
One way of testing a hypothesis is the standard method of conducting one of more experiments. These experiments will simulate world settings so that the experiment can be as close as possible to the real world.
Another method is to experience the hypothesis. The economist could just wait for events in the real world to either confirm or deny the hypothesis because the economy is dynamic and has been known to react uniquely to events that it otherwise should not have reacted to. It is therefore likely that it might react in a certain way that will enable the economist test their hypothesis.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": negligence per se.
Explanation:
Negligence per se is a concept of the United States law that finds an act to be reckless because it violates a statute. To prove negligence per se, the victim will usually show that the defendant violated the law, the act caused the kind of damage that the statute was intended to prevent, and he was a member of the protected class of the statute.
