Solution:
Let's start by assuming that the taxi ride demand is extremely elastic, to the extent that it is vertically sluggish! If the cabbies raise the fair price by 10% from 10.00 per mile to 11.00 per kilometre, the number of riders remains 20.
Total income before fair growth= 20* 10= 200.
Total income following fair growth = 11* 20= 220.
A 10% increase in the fare therefore leads to a 10% increase in the driver's revenue.
Therefore, the assumption in this situation is that the cab drivers think the taxi driving requirement is highly inelastic.
The demand curve facing the drivers of the cab is still inelastic, but not vertically bent.
When the rate increased from 10% to 11, riders declined from 20% to 19%
Total revenue before fair growth is 20* 10= 200
The gap between revenue and fair growth is 19* 11= 209
This means that a realistic 10% raise doesn't result in a 10% boost on income Because the market curve for taxi rides is not 100% inelastic, but rather low inelastic, so that a fair increase (control) allows consumers to lose their incomes.
Answer:
I don't know
Explanation:
Prepare a narrated PowerPoint presentation that will highlight the following items.
a. Your calculations for the amount of property, plant, and equipment and the annual depreciation for the project
b. Your calculations that convert the project's EBIT to free cash flow for the 12 years of the project.
c. The following capital budgeting results for the project:
1. Net present value
2. Internal rate of return
3. Discounted payback period.
Answer:
a. What is the expected return of the risky corporate bond over the 5-year holding-period (in %)?
expected return in $ = (50% x 20% x $1,000 x 4) + (50% x 35% x $1,000 x 4) = $400 + $700 = $1,100
holding period return = ($1,100 - $1,000) / $1,000 = 10%
b. What is its effective annual return?
(1 + 10%)⁰°² - 1 = 1.92%
b. What is its effective annual return?
- 2. The government bond is the superior investment
The yield of he corporate bond is very low and the risk is too high.
it is intrapersonal, and i know that for a fact.
The equilibrium between possible threats and prospective compensation is known as risk/return trade-off.
