Answer:
under-applied overheads is $1,340
Explanation:
Note : I have attached the full question/similar as an image below.
Actual Overheads = $594,960
Applied Overheads = $594,960 / 22,200 x 22,150 = $593,620
Since,
Actual Overheads > Applied Overheads, overheads have been under-applied.
Amount of under-applied overheads is $1,340 ($594,960 - $593,620).
1. ATM
2. Use a debit card at grocery store and get money back
3. Move money between bank accounts
4. Physically withdrawl the money inside the bank.
5. Grocery stores have customer service and for a fee you can withdrawl the money
Back in 2015, McDonald’s was struggling. In Europe, sales were down 1.4% across the previous 6 years; 3.3% down in the US and almost 10% down across Africa and the Middle East. There were a myriad of challenges to overcome. Rising expectations of customer experience, new standards of convenience, weak in-store technology, a sprawling menu, a PR-bruised brand and questionable ingredients to name but a few.
McDonald’s are the original fast-food innovators; creating a level of standardisation that is quite frankly, remarkable. Buy a Big Mac in Beijing and it’ll taste the same as in Stratford-Upon Avon.
So when you’ve optimised product delivery, supply chain and flavour experience to such an incredible degree — how do you increase bottom line growth? It’s not going to come from making the Big Mac cheaper to produce — you’ve already turned those stones over (multiple times).
The answer of course, is to drive purchase frequency and increase margins through new products.
Numerous studies have shown that no matter what options are available, people tend to stick with the default options and choices they’ve made habitually. This is even more true when someone faces a broad selection of choices. We try to mitigate the risk of buyers remorse by sticking with the choices we know are ‘safe’.
McDonald’s has a uniquely pervasive presence in modern life with many of us having developed a pattern of ordering behaviour over the course of our lives (from Happy Meals to hangover cures). This creates a unique, and less cited, challenge for McDonald’s’ reinvention: how do you break people out of the default buying behaviours they’ve developed over decades?
In its simplest sense, the new format is designed to improve customer experience, which will in turn drive frequency and a shift in buying behaviour (for some) towards higher margin items. The most important shift in buying patterns is to drive reappraisal of the Signature range to make sure they maximise potential spend from those customers who can afford, and want, a more premium experience.
I hope this was helpful
Answer:
Phantom profit= $500
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Purchased: 230 units for $8
Purchased: 330 units for $9
Purchased: 270 units for $10.
At the end of the month, 310 units remained.
The method with the highest ending inventory will result in the lowest cost of goods sold.
First, we need to calculate the ending inventory under FIFO method.
FIFO (first-in, first-out):
Ending inventory= 270*10 + 40*9= $3,060
Now, we calculate the ending inventory under the LIFO method and compare it with FIFO.
LIFO (last-in, first-out)
Ending inventory= 230*8 + 80*9= $2,560
Phantom profit= 3,060 - 2,560= $500
Answer:
Direct Material Price Variance = $300 Favorable
Explanation:
Direct Material Price Variance = (Standard Price - Actual Price) 
Actual Quantity
Standard Price = $4 per pound
Actual Price = 
= 
Since the actual price is less than the standard price the variance will be favorable as the amount paid for actual use is less then the estimated standard cost.
Thus, direct material price variance = ($4 - $3.8) 1,500
= $300 Favorable
