1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dybincka [34]
3 years ago
14

Sarah owns half of Smith Realty, Inc., and her brother Bill owns the other half. Sarah routinely uses the company car, which is

supposed to be used only for taking clients to view property, not to run her personal errands. She also routinely uses company funds for personal uses, but always pays the money back in to the corporation. When Smith Realty failed to pay its lawyer for work completed on its behalf, the lawyer sued Smith Realty as well as Sarah and Bill personally. In this situation the court likely will: a. not pierce the corporate veil, because there was no commingling of interests. b. not allow Sarah and John to be sued individually, because Smith Realty is a close corporation. c. pierce the corporate veil due to Sarah's comingling of interests. d. dismiss the case, because Smith Realty is a close corporation.
Business
2 answers:
anzhelika [568]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

(c) pierce the corporate veil due to Sarah's commingling of interests

Explanation:

Commingling of interests usually occurs when an investment manager or realtor combines client money with their own or their firm's, in violation of a contract. This can occur in legal cases, corporate client accounts and real estate transactions. For example in this case Sarah has violated her rights as a realtor by routinely using their company funds for her own personal uses.

a_sh-v [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C) pierce the corporate veil due to Sarah's commingling of interests.

Explanation:

Smith Realty Inc. is a closed corporation since its only shareholders are Sarah and Bill. The corporate veil is a legal principle that separates the actions of the corporation from the actions of its owners, both Sarah and Bill. Piercing the corporate veil means that the limited liability protection that Sarah and Bill had as stockholders will be eliminated. That means that the corporation and the stockholders will be treated as one same entity, something similar to a partnership.

A court might decide to pierce the corporate veil in Sarah's case, it will be very difficult to to sue Bill for Sarah's wrongdoings. The lawyer can claim that Sarah commingled her own interests with the interests of the corporation because she used the corporation's assets for her own personal use, therefore she can be considered a single entity with it. In this case, commingling means to mix the shareholder's interest with the corporation's interests.  

You might be interested in
A firm uses 80 hours of labor and 6 units of capital to produce​ 10,000 gadgets per day.​ Labor's marginal product is 4 gadgets
Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

Use more labor and fewer capital.

Explanation:

Given that,

For producing 10,000 gadgets,

Labor hours use = 80

Capital = 6 units

Marginal product of labor = 4 gadgets per hour

Marginal product of capital = 20 gadgets per unit

Cost of each unit of labor = $8 per hour

Cost of each unit of capital = $50 per unit

Therefore,

Marginal product per dollar for labor is as follows:

\frac{MP_{L} }{w} =\frac{4}{8}

        = 0.5

Marginal product per dollar for capital is as follows:

\frac{MP_{k} }{r} =\frac{20}{50}

        = 0.4

Hence, the marginal product per dollar for labor is greater than the marginal product per dollar for capital, which means that the firm should use more labor and fewer capital.

5 0
3 years ago
Choose all that apply.
denpristay [2]

reasons:

safe

high interest rates

no fees

5 0
3 years ago
Who do u want to be with girls or boys
torisob [31]

Answer:

wdumm??

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
20. The shipment of goods or rendering of services to a foreign buyer, located in a
Mnenie [13.5K]
That is Importing. Option A.
7 0
2 years ago
The semiconductor business of the California Microtech Corporation qualifies as a component of the entity according to GAAP. The
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

$1,650,000

Explanation:

Preparation of the lower portion of the 2021 income statement .

2021 Income from continuing operations before income taxes5,800,000

Income tax expense(1,450,000)

($5,800,000 × 25 %)

Income from continuing operations4,350,000

Discontinued operations:

Loss from operations of discontinued component(3,600,000)

Income tax benefit 900,000

(25*3,600,000)

Loss on discontinued operations(2,700,000)

Net income$1,650,000

(4,350,000-2,700,000)

Therefore the the lower portion of the 2021 income statement is $1,650,000

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Some of the money that people deposit into a bank eventually becomes an injection into the economy when the bank:
    11·2 answers
  • Analysts say visitors stay an average of how many seconds on any webpage?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these statements is TRUE of complementary products?
    15·1 answer
  • On February 1, 2021, a company loans one of its employees $29,000 and accepts a ten-month, 8% note receivable. Calculate the amo
    12·1 answer
  • sold inventory for $ 280 comma 000​, terms 4​/10, ​n/30. Cost of goods sold was $ 160 comma 000. How much sales revenue will Old
    13·1 answer
  • At Blyrie Apparels, the apparel stocks in the firm's outlets are changed every week. This is based on the changing fashion prefe
    14·1 answer
  • Blackmon Brothers law firm used 165 legal pads over the last three weeks (15 days). It takes them three days to get more, and th
    8·1 answer
  • Sommer, Inc., is considering a project that will result in initial after tax cash savings of $2.3mil at the end of the first yea
    10·1 answer
  • Hat is a​ monopoly?
    6·1 answer
  • What does zero economic profit mean in a perfectly competitive market in the long run?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!