1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dybincka [34]
3 years ago
14

Sarah owns half of Smith Realty, Inc., and her brother Bill owns the other half. Sarah routinely uses the company car, which is

supposed to be used only for taking clients to view property, not to run her personal errands. She also routinely uses company funds for personal uses, but always pays the money back in to the corporation. When Smith Realty failed to pay its lawyer for work completed on its behalf, the lawyer sued Smith Realty as well as Sarah and Bill personally. In this situation the court likely will: a. not pierce the corporate veil, because there was no commingling of interests. b. not allow Sarah and John to be sued individually, because Smith Realty is a close corporation. c. pierce the corporate veil due to Sarah's comingling of interests. d. dismiss the case, because Smith Realty is a close corporation.
Business
2 answers:
anzhelika [568]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

(c) pierce the corporate veil due to Sarah's commingling of interests

Explanation:

Commingling of interests usually occurs when an investment manager or realtor combines client money with their own or their firm's, in violation of a contract. This can occur in legal cases, corporate client accounts and real estate transactions. For example in this case Sarah has violated her rights as a realtor by routinely using their company funds for her own personal uses.

a_sh-v [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C) pierce the corporate veil due to Sarah's commingling of interests.

Explanation:

Smith Realty Inc. is a closed corporation since its only shareholders are Sarah and Bill. The corporate veil is a legal principle that separates the actions of the corporation from the actions of its owners, both Sarah and Bill. Piercing the corporate veil means that the limited liability protection that Sarah and Bill had as stockholders will be eliminated. That means that the corporation and the stockholders will be treated as one same entity, something similar to a partnership.

A court might decide to pierce the corporate veil in Sarah's case, it will be very difficult to to sue Bill for Sarah's wrongdoings. The lawyer can claim that Sarah commingled her own interests with the interests of the corporation because she used the corporation's assets for her own personal use, therefore she can be considered a single entity with it. In this case, commingling means to mix the shareholder's interest with the corporation's interests.  

You might be interested in
How many times will interest be added to the principal in 1 year if the interest is compounded quarterly? A. 6 B. 12 C. 4 D. 3
nadezda [96]

Answer:

How many times will interest be added to the principal in 1 year if the interest is compounded quarterly?  C. 4

Explanation:

Compounding means at the end of every term, the interest adds up to the Principal Amount. Compounded quarterly means, you do it for every three months. So after every three months, your interest will be added to principal.

7 0
3 years ago
Using a computerized Inventory Management System, a Paint Supply Store franchise continuously monitors the inventory of all the
KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

A. $348.29

Explanation:

Given that:

The Paint Supply Store franchise sells an average of 30 gallons of Red Paint every week (for 52 weeks per year)

i.e weekly demand = 30 gallons

Since 30 gallons is demanded weekly

Then annual demand for a year that contains 52 weeks = 30 × 52

= 1560

Order quantity = 70 gallons

Thus; number of orders = annual demand for a year / order quantity

number of orders = 1560 /70

number of orders = 22.2857

Price per gallon = $2.00

Time to receive order = 1.25 weeks

Administrative cost Ordering paint (i.e ordering cost per order) = $15

The total Ordering cost per order = number of orders × ordering cost per order

The total Ordering cost per order =  22.2857 × 15

The total Ordering cost per order =  $334.2855

Holding cost = 20% of the purchase price per gallon per year

Holding cost = 20/100 × $2

Holding cost =  0.2 × $2

Holding cost = $0.4 per unit per year

∴

The Inventory Holding cost = ( order quantity /2 ) × holding cost

The Inventory Holding cost =  (70/2) × 0.4

The Inventory Holding cost = 35  × 0.4

The Inventory Holding cost = $14

Finally, Total Annual Inventory Cost for the company's current policy is :

Total Annual Inventory Cost  = Total Ordering cost per order + Inventory Holding cost

Total Annual Inventory Cost  =  $334.2855 + $14

Total Annual Inventory Cost = $348.2855

Total Annual Inventory Cost ≅ $348.29

5 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
ZanzabumX [31]

Nepal is multi media is co on of this

5 0
2 years ago
How did the role of the onondaga people differ from the roles of the other four trives of iroquois nation?
maxonik [38]

According to Articles 1 and 10, the role of the Onondaga differs from that of the other four Iroquois tribes because the Onondaga land is planted with a tree of peace and they are firefighters.

The Mohawks, the Oneidas, the Onondagas, the Cayugas, and the Senecas fought against each other. There was massive bloodshed and death all around us. These people of the five nations have forgotten their ways, and their deeds grieve the creator. The creator decided to send messengers so that the five nations could live in peace. The messenger is called Peacemaker.

Peacemaker was born on the north shore of Lake Ontario. There he grew up with his mother and his grandmother. They quickly realized that this young man was a special person. He always spoke of peace and said that the creator had given him a powerful message.

Learn more about Onondaga here :

brainly.com/question/25785890

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
Explain whether you agree or disagree with the following statement.
butalik [34]

Answer: AGREE

Explanation:

A Monopoly faces no competition and are the only sellers of the product they sell. If firms in an industry successfully engage in collusion, the resultant effect will definitely be not unlike a Monopoly because they will set prices as a single firm, control output as a single firm and essentially run the market as a single firm.

They will sell at a rate where the Marginal Revenue curve will be below the demand curve. This will mean a higher price than a competitive market which was probably the main incentive for collusion.

A recent example would be the collusion between BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen, to hinder technological progress in improving the quality of vehicle emissions in order to reduce the cost of production and maximize profits. Thankfully this was busted by the European Commission in 2019.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Refer to scenario 1.3. which environmental factor is exemplified by the customer trend that consumers were no longer willing to
    8·1 answer
  • During the Reagan administration, the Laffer curve was used to argue that: a. lower income tax rates could increase tax revenues
    12·1 answer
  • All production costs have been steadily rising at Donner Company for several periods. In this environment, Donner Company’s cost
    15·1 answer
  • In the Boston Consulting Group's Growth Share Matrix, the relative competitive position of a product or division is defined as i
    9·2 answers
  • A formal written accusation submitted to a court by a prosecutor alleging that a specific person has committed a specified offen
    12·1 answer
  • Meger Manufacturing uses the direct labor cost method for applying factory overhead to production. The budgeted direct labor cos
    7·1 answer
  • Sweet Company reports a pretax financial income of $72,600 for 2020. The following items cause taxable income to be different th
    6·1 answer
  • After defining the problem that eCompeteUSA wants solved, you need to determine what type of research objective to pursue. What
    6·1 answer
  • concord corporation purchased a new machine on may 1, 2012 for $559200. at the time of acquisition, the machine was estimated to
    11·1 answer
  • Discuss the major options organizations have for reducing labor surpluses. In doing so, discuss how they vary in terms of speed
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!