Answer:
Iktomi the Spider from Lakota Culture or Anansi the Spider from West African Culture
Explanation:
I read something on this in my english class. Dont know if this will help you, I tried :)
Compared to a speaker who is less confident and apprehensive, the very confident speaker is seen as being more accurate, competent, credible, smart, informed, likeable, and convincing.
Industrial Revolution refers to the explosion of manufacturing involving new technology and new energy resources, in the late 18th centrury.
Explanation:
The industrial revolution was a watershed event in the history of mankind. The revolution started in Great Britain and was not instantaneous as is thought to be, but a continuous period of innovations, inventions and discoveries.
The period saw humans initially harnessing the animal power for performing work (e.g. mule, horses) which later changed into steam and then fossils (e.g. coal). The period also saw the establishment of industries which has breakthrough over the earlier practice of workers working in their homes.
Textiles were at the foremost in utilising the opportunity provided by the Industrial revolution and perpetuating the colonialism in colonised countries (e.g. as in India)
The best answer is:
“…his funeral mound should be erected in sight of that of his dear friend Thorsten, so that their spirits might not be separated even in death.”
Garrison was talking regarding how<span> he was </span>attempting to interrupt<span> the chain and </span>finish<span> slavery. His was mainly criticising that he tried </span>to vary the purpose<span> of </span>reading<span> of the slave </span>house owners<span> in </span>holding<span> go and setting their slaves free. He </span>conjointly inspired<span> the slaves that </span>sooner or later they're going to<span> be </span>able to cut loose which<span> slavery would be over. He did succeed and </span>finish<span> the slavery, </span>that creates<span> this </span>an awfully vital<span> role in </span>Yankee<span> History.</span>
Answer:
Thoreau sees a moral distinction between failing to prevent an injustice and actually causing an injustice. Consider an example. Thoreau argues that the United States' invasion of Mexico is immoral and that Americans who support the government with their person (as soldiers) or property (through taxes) are complicit in that injustice. He would further say that a person should go to jail rather than be responsible for that invasion. However, imagine a case in which another country was invading Mexico, but that by offering himself up as some sort of hostage and allowing himself to be imprisoned, he could stop that invasion. Thoreau would argue that while it would be perfectly moral to go to jail in this case, he would not be required to do so. As a human being, he may legitimately have other ends or goals that require him to be out of jail. It is not his job to promote the best world possible by any means necessary. All that can be asked of a person is that he not dirty his own hands with injustice. Once this requirement is fulfilled, each individual should decide for himself what to do with his life. This distinction is rooted in Thoreau's belief that individuals should look inward for how they should live their lives. A person's primary duty is to be true to himself--to act with integrity and to pursue personal moral goals.
Explanation:
Im sorry if its long