Answer: According to Tetlock argument, Expert with good predictive power should be willing to;
• EXPLORE DIVERSE INFORMATION AND ANALYTICAL MODEL
• CHALLENGE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM
• BE COMFORTABLE WITH COMPLEXITY AND UNCERTAINTY.
Therefore option b,c,e is the right answer.
Explanation: The predictive power of a scientist is the power a scientist has to generate a testable prediction, thereby making its theory to be a testable prediction.
For an expert to have good predictive power it must have the ability to explore diverse information and analytical model, because when you explore different information and analyse it in the best form, you will be able to postulate more information and discoveries, which can help you to predict a testable theory. By exploring you are trying to challenge conventional wisdom, of why should this be this?, You may get confused and uncertain at a point. But if he you have a good predictive power, you can be able to absorb it all to achieve your discovery and produce a scientific theory with a predictive power.
<span>The ability to distinguish between right and wrong is called morality. A person's morality is determined by different factors, such as education, religion, and upbringing. That is why there is not a universal method for determining right and wrong. People's individual experiences are the main influencing factors on morality.</span>
Explanation:
K is the answer i think:)
Claim: The United States of America needs political parties in the country to maintain a sense of division among its citizens.
Evidence:
-not everyone has the same opinions, this division will always exist, this way it is more orderly
- having political parties is a good way to separate our candidates for elections
- political parties establish a sense of common ground within citizens who share the same beliefs/morals/etc
hope this helped; mark Brainly please
