Answer:
See Explanation
Explanation:
Given
The histogram
Required
The class width
The question is poorly formatted, as the histogram cannot be read. So, I will answer your question with the attached histogram
The class width is:
Using the first class, as reference:
So, the class width is:
Answer:
E.cooperative
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that Stephanie Johns is most likely shopping in a cooperative store. This is a type of store that is owned and managed by the customers themselves, using their own capital for the business and at the same time share in the dividends provided. Which in this case are savings from lower food prices.
Answer:
The answer is explained below
Explanation:
The companies board of directors as well as you would consider whether it is best to install the scubber system. When determining whether to install the scubber system both short and long term consequences are to be considered. If presently, the level of pollution is legal, you need to consider if in the future it would be legal? if the installation of the scubber system would affect the public relations of the company. After considering all this, it would be better to install because the pollution can lead to death, and the neighborhood can sue the company. Also the EPA regulations can be regulated.
Answer:
a. $112,000
b. $7,500
Explanation:
(a) transferred out
Units transferred out are 100% complete for both materials and conversion costs, thus multiply the Total Cost per Equivalent units with the number of units transferred.
Cost of units transferred out = $8 × 14,000 units
= $112,000
(b) in ending work in process
Units of ending work in process are 100% complete in terms of materials ( since materials are entered at the beginning of the process) whilst 25% complete in terms on conversion cost (applied uniformly during production).
Cost of ending work in process
Materials ($3 × 2,000 units) = $6,000
Conversion ($3 × (2,000 units × 25%)) = $1,500
Total Cost = $7,500
Answer:
Explanation:
Arguments supporting Affirmative Action:
1) Affirmative action is a method that ensure the diversity is obtained and maintained in schools and workplaces. Moreover, it also helps to create tolerant communities therefore, it exposes people to a variety of cultures and ideas that are different from their own.
2)Affirmative action assists disadvantaged people that come from areas of the country where opportunities are limited be able to advance and they otherwise could not. In other words, it bestows everybody the same playing field.
3)Affirmative action is for to help by compensating to some races who are"started late in the race" , due to many years of oppression, and it also helps level the playing field.
Arguments against Affirmative Action:
1) Affirmative Action can be described as reverse discrimination. More specifically, past discrimination against some minority groups does not justify existing discrimination against them.
2) It weakens the notion of meritocracy and instead weakens races as a dominant factor in recruitment and recruitment procedures. Regardless of the situation, the best people for the position should be placed there.
3) Students / staff involved in the approval process are often not fully prepared for the assignment.
4) Affirmative Action strengthens stereotypes and racism compared to the previous point. People who give a position almost positively because of their activity are often unsuitable and the idea that all people in this race are "stupid" is endless.
5) People of different races or ethnic backgrounds do not need to have differences of opinion in the workplace / university. People with the same skin color are not necessarily the same in terms of vision or culture.
