The correct options are "determining the central idea of the text"; "looking for facts and examples"; "considering all the evidence" and " finding repeated words and phrases".
In the process of citing supporting details it is necessary to have the central idea of the text in mind so as to make sure the quotations are connected to the text. Since the purpose of citing is to support ideas, you need to find examples and specific facts, and to evaluate their appropiatness and connection to the text. Some repetition within the text is necessary as well because it helps you establish the connection between the citation and the text, so as to help the reader follow the text easily
I cannot read the lines, because you did not post them, however, you gave me enough to work with to understand your question.
My answer would be:
Yes, I do agree. There is no sweeter sight than a man's own native country. Just imagine soldiers coming back from war, imagine how relieved and relaxed and happy they must be to see the land they call home.<span />
B. NOUN
I HOPE THIS HELPS!
To conduct or rule over a certain person, place or thing
Answer:
The questions you need to ask yourself for the criteria are:
1. Above all, do you think this paper is worth reading? Does it apply to real life or what the author wants it to apply to?
2. Does it have well structured sentences? Does it make sense without you having to read it over again? Chances are if the paper doesn't make sense to you, it won't to readers.
3. Is there a point being argued? If so, make sure the author's points have validity and are true.
4. Peer review is all about opinion, so do you think in your opinion, bluntly, <em>is this actually good ?</em>
