Answer:
It depends on the matter, such as how Susan B Anthony broke the law of being a woman voting in my eyes such thing is silly to be a law and to be arrested for, other matters such as murder, theft, and plenty of other things should never be okay to break the law for. I would only break the law over things I feel is ridiculous and it should be done such as what Susan did when she voted, I would've also voted as a woman because she did nothing wrong in my opinion. I may not have much personal experience so let's instead look at Rosa Parks who was arrested because she wouldn't give her seat up to a white person, heck I most certainly would not have to, when Rosa broke that "law" of not getting off her seat for the white person she did nothing wrong in that act but was still arrested for it and again in my eyes she did not do anything wrong by breaking that law.
Explanation:
Hope this helps i wrote it off the top of my head :) stay safe!!
The subordinate clause here is A, "as the layers of ash slowly compressed". Subordinate means that it cannot exist on its own, it has to be a part of the main, independent clause.
Answer:
D). The passage fails to make a debatable claim.
Explanation:
The key weakness of the given passage is that 'it fails to establish a debatable claim.' A claim is characterized as debatable when the readers could reasonably argue on different opinions regarding it but here the 'claim regarding the presence of gothic elements' in Hawthorne's 'Scarlett Letter' and Herman Melville's 'Moby-D' is already agreed upon and accepted as a fact. Thus, <u>there remains no point in persuading the readers' to believe in it by comparing the two</u>. Another weakness of this passage is that the evidence presented here fails to support the claim. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
