Answer: Nicollo Machiavelli
Explanation: renaissance thinker. Machiavelli is not a medieval political thinker (as Dante Alighieri in his "Monarchy") anymore. His political thougths do not refer to metaphysical, divine realm. His political thought takes place in profane, secular realm.
B. A proposed law being considered by Congress
Prior to the Civil War, the (dominant) discourse over the United States’ future reach a crisis point in that the divide grew between the North and the South over the status of slaves with the north favoring a more liberal view.
<h3>What were the arguments regarding the Constitutionality of slavery and notions of citizenship?</h3>
Throughout the mid-1800s, disagreements about the institution of slavery erupted, eventually leading to the Civil War: sociological reasons such as: whites being superior to blacks were presented.
The south contended that slaves were economically useful due to the steady work supply."
Hence the attrition.
<h3>How did relative definitions of liberty/freedom/equality become irreconcilable?</h3>
The relative definitions of liberty and freedom that became irreconcilable was when the notion of negative liberty was coined.
This notion was suggestive of the fact that:
Negative liberty is the freedom from outside intervention and that it is concerned largely with freedom from external restriction, as opposed to positive liberty (ownership of the capacity and resources to realize one's own potential).
Learn more about the civil war at;
brainly.com/question/1020924
#SPJ1
Explanation:
they brought to the forefront the contradictions between America's ideals of democracy and equality.
The act forced citizens to assist in the recovery of escaped slaves, and if they were unwilling to assist or aided a fugitive in escaping, they were subject to a fine and prosecution. ... But the compromise made many Northerners more determined than ever to end slavery.