<span>Government increases the tax rate.
Consumers have less money to spend.
</span>Producers manufacture fewer goods.
Inflationary pressure decreases.<span>
</span>
Answer:
Employees whose values match the values of the organization they work for generally SHOW MORE COMMITMENT TO THEIR JOBS than employees whose values don't match the organization.
Explanation:
Workplace values are the guiding principles that are most integral to the way a company works. Simply put, company's values, and the culture they create can spell the difference between success and failure.
The way people behave is deeply rooted in their values, when employees share their company's values, they make more informed decisions and are more committed to their jobs.
Sharing same values with the organization one works with increases the rate of productivity as one tends to be more motivated and dedicated to the job.
Therefore, the answer that best suits the question is that employees whose values match the values of the organization SHOW MORE COMMITMENT TO THEIR JOBS than employees whose values don't match the organization.
The difference between the realized overheads and the estimated overheads is the total overhead cost.
<h3>What are total overhead costs?</h3>
Total overhead costs are identified as the costs related to administration, sales, marketing, and production. Before the total overhead costs are realized, a budget regarding estimated costs is prepared.
The calculation of the total overhead costs is actual overhead costs less the budgeted overhead costs.
Hence, the aforementioned statement regarding total overhead costs holds true.
Learn more about total overhead costs here:
brainly.com/question/13018280
#SPJ1
Answer:
A) Laws represent the minimum guidelines that companies must follow,whereas a firm's ethical stance may venture beyond the minimum level of compliance.
Explanation:
In the given scenario there are laws that allows community and state police to set up sobriety check points that discourages drunk drivers and saves lives.
The inclusion or removal of applications that helps drunk drivers avoid these checkpoints is not covered by the law. So if a company decides to include such applications it is at their discretion.
Blackberry have chosen to remove applications that helps drunk drivers avoid checkpoints. This is an example of when a company has ventured beyond the minimum level of compliance because of their ethical stance.
Google and Apple however have only ventured beyond the minimum compliance level because they have refused to honour requests by legislators to remove apps that permit smartphone users to navigate around the checkpoints.
