<span>This speaker is guilty of "attack on a person".
Argumentum ad hominem is a argumentative technique whereby a contention is countered by assaulting the character, thought process, or other characteristic of the individual making the contention, or people related with the contention, instead of assaulting the substance of the contention itself.
</span>
I believe the answer is: A just-noticeable difference
In painting, A just-noticeable difference refers to the amount of things that needed to be change for a difference to be noticeable.
The threshold usually depended on the type of audience that being aimed toward, (for common audience, the threshold of differences would be relatively higher compared to expert audience)<span />
The word we need to fill into the
sentence is ‘such’. ‘The following statement would be compatible with such
ideology. Therefore, capitalism should pull some psychological strings over the
population. The security sensation and the artificial welfare, based on a
massive-purchasing lifestyle, are certainly psychological mechanisms developed
by companies and most of the capitalist media.
Answer:
<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>
Explanation:
- Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
- However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
- Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
Needing the land and disease is your answer
