1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
den301095 [7]
3 years ago
10

________ often presents as a cyclical pattern of tension-building violent episodes and calm

Social Studies
1 answer:
ryzh [129]3 years ago
3 0

<u>The dating violence</u><u> </u>often presents as a cyclical pattern of tension-building violent episodes and calm

The Dating violence is the cyclical pattern of emotional, physical, verbal or sexual abuse that occurs in a relationship, whether straight or gay relationships; and it's commonly depicted by an abuser and a "victim". It is characterized for having three repetitive states:

  1. The "calm or honeymoon" stage: In here, the abuser tends to be affectionate and caring somehow, tends to buy presents or give some sort of attention, makes promises and they ask for forgiveness for any wrong they did or may deny that the abuse happened.
  2. The "tension building" stage: The abuser may act jealous, possessive, isolate the other person from other people, pick fights with the victim, criticize him or her, threaten to hurt the victim, someone they care or themselves if the victim doesn't do what the abuser wants, and has mood swings.
  3. The violent stage: The abuser uses force to hurt the victim in any way: Shoving, Punching, Slapping, pinching, hitting, kicking, hair pulling; may destroy possessions, may use a weapon, yell, insult, etc.  
You might be interested in
Read the excerpt from "fish cheeks." dinner threw me deeper into despair. my relatives licked the ends of their chopsticks and r
solniwko [45]
The answer would be c all the other answer not make sence

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement BEST analyzes the revolutionary contributions of Chiang Kai-shek and Mao Zedong?
anyanavicka [17]
D.mao zedong`s communlist party defeated chiang kai-shek`s nationalist party in china 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In order to prove fraud, which of these elements must be shown? the innocent party knew the wrongdoer. the innocent party was th
anzhelika [568]
To prove frauds, we need to show that <span>The innocent party relied on the wrongdoer's representation.
If the accused in fraud case represent true representation despite the negative effect that experienced by the accuser than the court will rule that the accuser just make a really bad business decision rather than being scammed.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Although 3-year-old Adam happily explores the attractive toys located in the dentist's waiting room, he periodically returns to
Gwar [14]

Answer:

The answer is a) secure attachment.

Explanation:

As described by Marie Ainsworth, children who present the secure attachment type feel a small degree of distress when they leave their caregivers. However, they are able to keep calm knowing they will son be reunited.

Children with secure attachment are believed to be more independent and develop better social skills.

5 0
3 years ago
Long answer questions: 1. "We all are Nepali, even though we are diverse in ability, sex, religion, culture and language." Justi
viktelen [127]

Answer:ok

Explanation:INTRODUCTION

Are fundamental rights, the sort of rights entrenched in written constitutions

and human rights instruments, binding on individuals or other private

actors? With few exceptions, most legal systems of the constitutional

democratic type answer this question in the negative. The German Basic

Law, for example, provides in article 1(3) that ‘constitutional rights bind the

legislature, the executive, and the judiciary’ , which means that they bind all

the three standard state powers but not private actors such as individuals,

Direct and Indirect Effects of Fundamental Rights

2

corporations, labor unions and the like. Similarly, the Fourteenth

Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that ‘no State shall

make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of

citizens of the United States’. The U.S. Supreme Court built a notoriously

large and obscure body of case law on top of this seemingly harmless

provision ― the basis of the so-called ‘state action doctrine’ ― the gist of it

being that constitutional rights do not bind private actors unless they are

acting as surrogates of the state or are placed under privileged protection

from it. What it all comes down to is rejection of the view that fundamental

rights normally bind private as well as public actors or that such rights

produce not only ‘vertical’ but ‘horizontal’ effect as well.

But this is hardly the end of the story. Even if fundamental rights

cannot be invoked in private relations ― meaning, for instance, that the

plaintiff cannot base her complaint on the defendant’s violation of a

constitutional entitlement or that the defendant cannot invoke a

constitutional liberty to evade liability ― they are fully operative against the

state in its capacity as law-maker, law-executor and law-enforcer. Imagine

the standard hypothetical of a landlord that sues the tenant for breach of a

term in the lease that placed the latter under an obligation to go to church

every weekend and to decorate the premises with religious paraphernalia.

While the doctrine of vertical effect bars the tenant from invoking freedom of

religion against the landlord, he may do so against the court itself qua

enforcer of the lease and against the legislature qua author of the laws which

empower private parties to create legal obligations inconsistent with freedom

of religion. If the laws in question are indeed unconstitutional, they must be

regarded as void. At the end of the day, the tenant will win the case precisely

as she would if she was allowed to invoke the constitutional right directly

against the landlord. The only difference is procedural: the rejection of

‘horizontal’ effect implies that she must obtain a judicial decision striking

down the law deemed unconstitutional in order to win the dispute against the

landlord. One way or another, the outcome is exactly the same

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which law passed in 1935 continues to help retired Americans today?
    10·2 answers
  • Religious reasons and political reasons why the people moved west
    8·1 answer
  • What kinds of the errors do you see in the passage that you would edit? Check the best answer.
    9·1 answer
  • What does ohanjwaste mean in english
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following professions is the best equivalent of a West African griot?
    12·1 answer
  • Thinking about party systems, which of the following is NOT an example of “equilibrium?”
    14·1 answer
  • Quantifying answers to public opinion poll questions is easier when the questions are __________. A. Open-ended, essay-style que
    13·2 answers
  • A scientific law is a statement based on repeated experimental observations. It describes some aspect of the world. A scientist
    13·1 answer
  • 4. Why do most people live in the cities and not the rural towns in Africa?
    8·1 answer
  • Okay so read this and answer the questions u don’t rly have to read it just scam the the question I don’t understand the reading
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!