Answer: hope this helps
The Sudeten crisis began in February 1938 when Hitler demanded self-determination for all Germans in Austria and Czechoslovakia. The Sudeten Nazi Party demanded union with Germany and started rioting. They caused so much trouble that the Czechs had to send in the army.
pls make me brainliest
The correct answer is C) It may not be given to independent groups.
<em>What is true of soft money today is that It may not be given to independent groups, it may be used for educational purposes. </em>
Today, soft money is not regulated. Soft money is the amount of money people donate to any political party, but this money does not have the purpose of helping directly a candidate, but for different matters. With this money, political parties can use it in their own discretion and there is no limit to it. They use this money to promote voter participation. On the opposite, when people donate to a specific candidate, then it is called Hard Money.
After the slavery was officially abolished in all of the US, the African Americans were quick to move out of the South and migrate massively toward the North. There were several factors as to why this happened. One big factor was that even though the slavery was abolished, the segregation and discrimination continued, so the opportunities in life were very limited. The South was not industrialized, while the North was heavily industrialized, thus the African Americans saw an opportunity to work in the factories instead in the fields. The atmosphere in the North was much better for them, as the majority of the people welcomed them and had no problems with them because of their skin color.
Cherokee Indian Cases (1830s)

In the cases Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) and Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the U.S. Supreme Court considered its powers to enforce the rights of Native American "nations" against the states. In Cherokee Nation, the Court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction (the power to hear a case) to review claims of an Indian nation within the United States. In Worcester, the Court ruled that only the United States, and not the individual states, had power to regulate or deal with the Indian nations.
