Answer:
the correct answer is A
Explanation:
murder is punished by law.
The statement that is not true about Archbishop William Laud's action is that "He had Catholic leanings which infuriated Anglican."
This is evident in that Archbishop William Laud was famous for being an Anglican in terms of doctrine.
He used his position to ensure people in England and Scotland practiced the Anglican doctrine, which sparked riots in Scotland, and later led to Bishop wars.
The major action he did was to push protestants orthodox practices to the Puritans.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A. "He had Catholic leanings which infuriated Anglicans."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/715752
Native American populations were decimated by diseases that had been brought by the Europeans.
Explanation:
When the Europeans discovered and settled in the New World, lot of changes occurred on both sides of the Atlantic. Many things were positive, especially when it came to exchange of goods, plants, and animals. Unfortunately, there were some negatives in it, with the spreading of diseases being among the most influential. The exchange between the two sides is known as the Columbian exchange.
The Europeans and the Native Americans had some diseases that were unique about them, and their immune systems were adapted to them, but they didn't had response for the diseases of the opposite side. Both sides suffered from this, but the effect was much greater among the Native Americans, as the majority of their populations died out because of the spreading of European diseases among them, such as the common cold and the smallpox.
Other negatives that occurred were:
- numerous wars
- systematic assimilation and genocide
- overtaking of territory
Learn more about the Columbian exchange brainly.com/question/2599432
#learnwithBrainly
The answer is Barack Obama
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the use of presentence investigation reports?
The advantage is that this kind of background investigation can lead to a considerable reduction of the sentence if the authority finds a considerable reason to do so. On the other hand, the disadvantage or risk is that a failure in the investigation provokes an incorrect decision about the right sentence for the criminal.
Should factors such as education, family, work history, and prior criminal history have an impact on sentencing?
Yes, they should. That is part of the investigation. If the criminal has had a previous "normal" life, with no serious conflicts at all, those factors can be contemplated to reduce the sentence of the individual.
Should any external factors make a difference? Yes, that is why there is this kind of investigation. The probation officer has the responsibility of preparing this presentence investigation report and has the faculty to consider the element it deems necessary to severely punish a criminal or reduce the sentence to help it.
