1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
g100num [7]
3 years ago
15

Did the Soviet Union pose a valid threat to the United States, and if so, should the US have used military power to end it. Whic

h do you think is the best system to solve the problems of the Cold War then and the Cold War we have now with North Korea ?
History
1 answer:
Aleksandr [31]3 years ago
6 0
One could argue that the Soviet Union provided a threat to America's global power and influence during the Cold War. However, in terms of military engagement, there was no real threat at the beginning of the Cold War. America was fearful that the communist system would continue to spread throughout Europe. This would directly affect America's global political and economic power, as the Soviet Union used a communist system. This system would restrict the economic opportunities of individuals controlled by the Soviet Union.


The US was right not to use military power to end it. Consider the Cuban Missile Crisis. If we attacked Cuba (where there were Soviet missiles) and didn't destroy all their missiles, they could launch an attack that could kill millions of Americans within minutes. This possibility of all out nuclear warfare would endanger the entire world, not just the US and Soviet Union.

I think this diplomatic measure is the best way to end the similar situation we have with North Korea right now. This would result in no soldier deaths, no civilian deaths, and would make the world a safer place.
You might be interested in
Which group was most harmed by railroad pools and monopolies?
masha68 [24]

small farmers were most hurted



railway operators cared less about the plight of a farmers and their policies was always geared to help wealthy industrailists who they gave rebates, small farmers complains often fell into deaf ears, and only after farmers formed assocations were their plight considered.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What factors helped the unification in Italy and Germany?
guajiro [1.7K]
Hi there, sorry for the late answer!

First of all, lets review what "Unification" is.
Unification is the process of joining parts together into a whole; in national unification, diverse regions are brought together as one nation.

The factors that helped the unification in Italy were..
Geography (Italy is isolated. The alps are to the north, and they are surrounded by oceans), History(Italians are very proud of their heritage, including the Italian Renaissance), and the Efforts of 3 men (Mazzini, Garibaldi, Cavour).

Factors that encouraged German Unification were because they could not persuade parliament, they were aligned with Austria to attack Denmark for Schleswig and Holstein, and had a quick victory increasing Prussian nationalism.




7 0
3 years ago
Seced after Abraham Lincoln was elected presdient?
stealth61 [152]

Explanation:

When Abraham Lincoln, a known opponent of slavery, was elected president, the South Carolina legislature perceived a threat. Calling a state convention, the delegates voted to remove the state of South Carolina from the union known as the United States of America. The secession of South Carolina was followed by the secession of six more states—Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas–and the threat of secession by four more—Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina. These eleven states eventually formed the Confederate States of America.

8 0
3 years ago
A currency is a system of money created and used by an individual or a group of people. all people who live in the same era. a n
lukranit [14]

Answer:

A nation or regain of the world

Explanation:

Took test on Ed

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why dø historians use chronology as an organizing principle?
charle [14.2K]

Answer: B. to establish a sense of change over time.

Explanation: When historians use chronology, they add all events, not just the major events that changed history.  Historians can't trace every recorded year in history either, especially since they weren't alive at the time of the event.  There aren't any themes when it comes to tracing back events, because it isn't a story we're looking for, it's the events of history.  Showing that history is best understood in eras doesn't make sense because it's too broad of a timeframe to aim for eras.

Let me know if this is right!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who did Ibrahim Lincoln died
    7·2 answers
  • What idea about government did the Founding Fathers include in the Preamble to the Constitution?
    13·1 answer
  • Which continent was carved up by european countries wanted colonies?
    6·1 answer
  • The Populist movement was most interested in improving conditions for whom?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following best illustrates the government’s concern for the plight of farmers?
    8·2 answers
  • Which political party was led by Thomas Jefferson?
    12·2 answers
  • 3. This table supports the conclusion that
    6·1 answer
  • Which method of protest (boycotts, sit-ins, or marches) had the greatest impact on the civil rights movement. Why?
    14·2 answers
  • Industrialization led to increased demands by the public for _______________.
    7·1 answer
  • As a result of the
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!