A rebuttal is a sort of countering something. For an author to cause his reply to become more grounded, he should point a rundown of defects on the given contention to balance it.
<h3>How can the writer revise the rebuttal to make it stronger? </h3>
Correct answer is option A.
- By rephrasing it as a conclusion.
- This will make it harder for the person who gave the assertion difficult to safeguard the case the individual in question is attempting to shield.
- The counterclaim has one significant component that the rejoinder doesn't, which is a solid and obvious source that upholds their position. In this way, the compose can make their reply more grounded by adding a measurement or citation.
Therefore, correct answer is option A.
For more information about rebuttal, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/3959097
A question that you could ask the author or a character is:
Author: How did you feel when you were writing this story? How did you get the idea of the plot and characters?
Character: When you were in the story, how did you feel about what you went through?
These are just my ideas :)
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Our cells need glucose to function, which is gained from the nutrients in the food. Oxygen is gained from breathing, so it has nothing to do with food.
I’m sorry, I don’t quite understand your question. Would you like to further elaborate so I can help? Let me know :)
Answer:
d they became overall more popular than downvoted posts
Explanation:
because I said so
